View Single Post
  #81  
Old January 13th, 2006, 12:33 PM
Krevinek's Avatar
Krevinek Krevinek is offline
Evil PPC Tweaker
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Krevinek will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke
Switching to 64-bit processors would in no way be screwing early adopters. Mac OS X will run on both 32-bit and 64-bit processors for a long while to come, and 64-bit computers have still got to prove any real-world improvement over 32-bit computers. So far, for consumers as well as most professionals (some special uses spring to mind, of course), it's nothing more than a buzzword.
Don't get me wrong, I didn't mean it in quite that sense. I meant it in a 'ZOMG! It can run Windoze!!!eleventy-one' sense. Without that CSM, dual-booting is an exercise of high-risk until 64-bit chips come out and we can run Vista or XP 64 on those. Drivers would be barrels of fun though, now that I think about it... Apple is keeping quite a bit of custom interfaces in their machines, even though the core chipset is standard Intel fare.

Quite simply, I give /very/ good odds towards the prediction that anyone who buys one of these 32-bit Intel systems will not be running Windows stand-alone on them for a very, very, very long time.
__________________
iMac G5 2.0Ghz (10.4.x, Main System)
MacBook 1.83Ghz (...Feburary)
"Sometimes I drive to run from all my demons \ Sometimes I drive so I can be alone \ Sometimes I drive to see the world in different light \ Sometimes I drive for no reason at all" - Assemblage 23, Drive
Reply With Quote