View Single Post
  #15  
Old January 1st, 2009, 07:47 PM
fryke's Avatar
fryke fryke is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,075
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
I personally love the idea of an iPhone nano. Of course it'd have the same screen pixel count in order not to provoke AppStore problems. But I have to wonder about the battery. Battery life on the iPhone 3G is abysmal when compared to smartphones like Nokia's Series 60 phones. A smaller phone with a _smaller_ battery won't do much better. So either it'd have to be 2G only (which is only a good idea in developing countries like the USA and nothing for, say, Europe) to improve battery life - or it'd have to be thicker.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote