View Single Post
  #23  
Old July 3rd, 2009, 07:59 AM
fryke's Avatar
fryke fryke is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,097
Thanks: 13
Thanked 95 Times in 89 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
I think they rather extend the iPhone platform. So: A larger iPod touch, yes. Apple doesn't think much of small notebooks. I mean: They've _never_ done a real subnotebook after the Duo line - and certainly never under Steve Jobs. Listen to the introduction of the MacBook Air once more, and about how proud they were that its keyboard is full-size and the screen is 13.3". But a larger iPod touch, I can see that. If it has 3G networking, just imagine the ease of use of Mobile Safari on the iPhone now, but with much better readability. (Of course it'll also tackle E-Books much better.)

(Satcomer: Your current signature makes your MacBook Pro look incredibly slow..., 2.16 MHz??)
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 & 10.6, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fryke For This Useful Post:
Satcomer (July 4th, 2009)