|
the reply i wanted! i had played around with the scalable UI in tiger, and you're right - it does get ugly. windows has always had a scalable UI - all the buttons, menu bars lists are all either vector/or levels of higher and higher res bitmaps, but it's been possible since 95, and all from the desktop properties...
i just thought it was a natural progression to go to 300dpi+ UI, but obviously it has slipped into Pipe-Dream along with Flash HDD (would we need ram? if we had 80gb of flash DDR memory?)
would be nice though
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head
iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |