image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #9  
Old December 10th, 2001, 06:39 PM
edX's Avatar
edX edX is offline
mac shaman
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
edX is on a distinguished road
coincidence?

i woke up and woke my imac up this morning and it too was amking all the processing noises you described and running very slowly in finder as if memory were being hogged. I didn't do all the tests you did, but it went away and went back to normal when i launched an app. I downloaded NAV beta but haven't touched it since it unpacked on the desktop. could this be our culprit? I also installed eddie's "classic?" and left it running in the doc. I think you also tried it didn't you? if so, this seems the more likely party.
__________________
20" 2ghz iMac G5 | 2GB ram | os 10.4 | 15" Ti PB 867 | 1 gb ram | os 10.3.9 | grape imacDV 400mhz | 512 mb ram | os10.2.8/9.2.2 | smc barricade router w/sbc yahoo dsl | HP psc-2355 all-in-one printer | graphire2 | Living happily ever after, every now and then
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old December 10th, 2001, 07:01 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,337
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
logfile rotation 2

a UNIX operating system logs quite a bit of system stuff. and it has schedules when to archive the logs and start new ones. or delete old ones. it also updates its databases (locate for example) in these schedules.
__________________
macnews.net.tc is active again.
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old December 11th, 2001, 03:26 AM
simX's Avatar
Unofficial Mac Genius
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
simX is on a distinguished road
Uh...

I REALLY doubt logfile rotation could take up 400 MB of memory. Wouldn't you agree? I would tend to think that the stuck process might be a more probable cause of this problem.
__________________
-- simX

Get Memory Usage Getter, the only Mac OS X utility that graphically displays the memory usage of your open processes! http://homepage.mac.com/simx/

450 MHz G4 Cube | 15" flat-panel Apple Studio Display | 896 MB RAM | Que! Fire 12x10x32x FireWire CD-RW | OS X 10.1.5 Build 5S66 | Mac OS 9.2.2 | Telex M-560 Microphone | Epson Stylus Color 777 | TI-Graph Link USB | Pro Speakers/Mouse/Keyboard | Airport card | iPod

"Some people's minds are like cement: all mixed up and permanently set..." -- Andrew Welch, el Presidente, Ambrosia Software, Inc.

"You know that first hit of heroin is free." -- Scott McNealy, Sun Microsystem's CEO, on Microsoft's .NET .

"The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old December 11th, 2001, 04:52 AM
simX's Avatar
Unofficial Mac Genius
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
simX is on a distinguished road
Woohoo!

I figured out what was causing the problem.

I noticed tonight that the same thing happened -- almost all of my memory was being actively used, plus I was noticing MASSIVE pageouts about every 2 seconds or so. So with the knowledge that Ed had recently installed NAV beta and Classic?, I decided to check on these two. Obviously, Classic? was easier to check on, since it was just an open application, and I simply had to quit it. Lo and behold, when I quit it, almost HALF of all of my memory (about 450 megs) freed up immediately. That's one hell of a memory leak in Classic?. I'll have to notify the creator to fix this immediately -- of course, if he changes it to a menuling or a dockling, this will probably go away anyway.

I guess this thread comes to a close. Phew, it's not Apple's fault.
__________________
-- simX

Get Memory Usage Getter, the only Mac OS X utility that graphically displays the memory usage of your open processes! http://homepage.mac.com/simx/

450 MHz G4 Cube | 15" flat-panel Apple Studio Display | 896 MB RAM | Que! Fire 12x10x32x FireWire CD-RW | OS X 10.1.5 Build 5S66 | Mac OS 9.2.2 | Telex M-560 Microphone | Epson Stylus Color 777 | TI-Graph Link USB | Pro Speakers/Mouse/Keyboard | Airport card | iPod

"Some people's minds are like cement: all mixed up and permanently set..." -- Andrew Welch, el Presidente, Ambrosia Software, Inc.

"You know that first hit of heroin is free." -- Scott McNealy, Sun Microsystem's CEO, on Microsoft's .NET .

"The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old December 11th, 2001, 08:07 AM
efoivx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
efoivx is on a distinguished road
Classic? leak fixed

I'm so sorry for the panic and confussion.
I didn't notice the leak myself guess I have alot of free ram and drive space.
I had it running for about 5 hours with no trouble.

anyway please accept my appology.

I beleive the new version has fixed the leak.
you can download it an see what happens
http://www.versiontracker.com/redir....iccheck012.sit

No gauruntee ymmv. hey it's free. but at least I got right on a fix :-)

all feedback, comments and suggestions appreciated

efo@mac.com

Cheers
Eddie
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old December 11th, 2001, 08:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 133
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
PoweMACuser is on a distinguished road
Re: Memory leak in the OS?

Quote:
Originally posted by simX
OK, so I woke up today, and I heard the disk churning a lot, and so I turned on my computer -- a glance at the memory monitor showed that over half of my memory was active or wired, and that the rest of it was inactive, and not free (I have 896 MB of RAM, so that's a HUGE amount of active+wired memory). So I checked in top to see what might be using all that memory -- Norton, or something. Nothing out of the ordinary using so much RAM. So I quit all of my applications. Still my active+wired memory was over half of my total RAM. But something didn't seem right -- I went back to top to check on the memory usage, and it didn't seem like it added up. So I grabbed a calculator -- and added up all the columns of memory for RPRVT, RSHRD, and RSIZE in top. Now I knew that I would be adding up more memory than was actually being used, because RPRVT and RSHRD are included in RSIZE.

Well, so what did I find? Total, as reported by all the processes individually, including the kernel (process 0 -- I believe process 0 is the first process, so I did include every process), the memory that was being used was 197.9 MB. But total, the top command was reporting an obscene 532 MB active, 603.2 active+wired! I've included a screenshot of the terminal window (it has some text superimposed on it because I need to register Snapz Pro X, but you should be able to read it) so you guys can check my math. Remember, I added up all 3 columns of the top command, so the 200 MB is probably over the actual total by about 50-100 MB.

Clearly something is wrong here. Does anybody know what could be causing this? Every once in a while it seems like it does this to an extent, but it hasn't done it to this degree. As we speak, over half of my memory is being used as active or wired memory, but I can't figure out what!! And the numbers in top still do not add up.

Any information would be appreciated.

P.S. I have to run right now, but I know that the picture of the terminal window looks really gross. I'm going to put the picture on my iDisk when I get back -- my member name is "simX" -- just go to my public folder.
Me too!!!, I have 1G RAM, but the system seems running under very low memory. No difference between 1G and 128 RAM when running 10.1. This must be the super bug in X.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Authoritative Partitioning Discussion mr. k Mac OS X System & Mac Software 13 November 11th, 2003 07:26 PM
memory issues (please help!) laboboy Mac Classic System & Software 2 April 30th, 2003 06:00 PM
memory leak? me281 Mac OS X System & Mac Software 5 May 24th, 2002 03:42 AM
apache memory leak? cody Mac OS X System & Mac Software 1 January 17th, 2002 07:34 PM
Disabling VM musey79 Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 4 October 8th, 2001 09:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.