image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

View Poll Results: Best overall (quality v. size balanced) bit-rate is ...
128kbps 9 12.16%
160kbps 24 32.43%
192kbps 32 43.24%
higher than 192kbps 9 12.16%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #25  
Old December 13th, 2001, 11:02 PM
Jadey's Avatar
sosumi
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: CANADA
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jadey is on a distinguished road
I couldn't vote! I encode at 64 bit to stuff more into my rio
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old December 14th, 2001, 02:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2001pass-var is on a distinguished road
"If anyone cares (probably not, but I'll say it anyways ) LP records still sound better than CD's. "

I couldn't agree with you more!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old December 15th, 2001, 12:56 AM
beef's Avatar
Dinner
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
beef is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by 2001pass-var
"If anyone cares (probably not, but I'll say it anyways ) LP records still sound better than CD's. "

I couldn't agree with you more!
and tubes are better!
__________________
what's for dinner?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old December 16th, 2001, 01:25 PM
GadgetLover's Avatar
Senior Member & Tech Guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Planet Earth (last I checked).
Posts: 413
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
GadgetLover is on a distinguished road
192k encoding

Quote:
Originally posted by beef


and tubes are better!
Yes, vacuum tubes DO rock.


Ok folks, so it looks like I'm going to re-encode ALL my CD's (that's a lot) at 192k (or 224k). Wadda ya think?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old December 17th, 2001, 02:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Myke is on a distinguished road
Quad EL63

Beef - re your comments about the EL63's - I have heard the new Quads and I don't think they are as good. Perhaps I'd get used to them if I had them at home for long enough ...

I'm not certain but I think that Quad continues to make the EL63 - mine aren't that old.

Hardcore HiFi fans prefer the original Quad electrostatics!

Couldn't agree more about valves (as we quaint oldworlders call them!)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old December 18th, 2001, 01:23 AM
beef's Avatar
Dinner
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
beef is on a distinguished road
Re: Quad EL63

Quote:
Originally posted by Myke
Beef - re your comments about the EL63's - I have heard the new Quads and I don't think they are as good. Perhaps I'd get used to them if I had them at home for long enough ...

I'm not certain but I think that Quad continues to make the EL63 - mine aren't that old.

Hardcore HiFi fans prefer the original Quad electrostatics!

Couldn't agree more about valves (as we quaint oldworlders call them!)
hmm... interesting... I knew there were shops that does repair, etc, for the original EL63's... but I wasn't aware that Quad still made those...

I guess I'd give Santa a call

and... yea... I have to agree... unless you can audition things at your own home for awhile... it's really hard to see how things fit in...
__________________
what's for dinner?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old December 18th, 2001, 03:08 PM
Jadey's Avatar
sosumi
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: CANADA
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jadey is on a distinguished road
Tubes don't actually sound better, they have more resonance, and if you prefer more resonance in your music, you're going to enjoy tubes more. It's subjective.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old December 18th, 2001, 04:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Myke is on a distinguished road
Subjective

I'm not sure what Jadey means by "resonance" - but I think it's a little more complex than that!

All the same it is true there's no 'right' answer in HiFi. The distortions involved in the recording process - such as the aural signature of microphones, the ambience of the recording environment, the 'mix' and so on - mean that you never get to hear the original sound.

But - so what? Good HiFi is still a joy to listen to.

By the way, Beef, I think you may be confusing the EL63's, which came out in the 80's, with the original Quad speakers which were made in the 60's.

The EL63's were definately on sale a couple of years ago when I last looked, alongside Quad's latest speakers, the name/number of which escape me.

Incidentally, can anyone explain why my G4/733 has an analogue audio output, but no input? I find the output pretty good, apart from a low level hum problem (I mean very low level)

However, using a music card like Protools Digi001 puts the Mac up there with the most expensive of HIFI.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any way to speed up iTunes AAC encoding? chicodoggy Mac OS X System & Mac Software 4 June 13th, 2003 02:56 AM
QuickTime 6.2 / iTunes AAC Encoding spitty27 Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 2 April 28th, 2003 07:39 PM
When will the iTunes encoding bug get fixed? bookem Mac OS X System & Mac Software 9 April 15th, 2003 03:06 PM
iTunes vs. LAME Encoding AJaX Mac OS X System & Mac Software 3 August 18th, 2002 06:40 PM
iTunes 2 is going nuts! Bloated Temp Files! GadgetLover Mac OS X System & Mac Software 8 April 11th, 2002 05:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.