| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Best overall (quality v. size balanced) bit-rate is ... | |||
| 128kbps | | 9 | 12.16% |
| 160kbps | | 24 | 32.43% |
| 192kbps | | 32 | 43.24% |
| higher than 192kbps | | 9 | 12.16% |
| Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#25
| ||||
| ||||
| I couldn't vote! I encode at 64 bit to stuff more into my rio ![]() |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| "If anyone cares (probably not, but I'll say it anyways ) LP records still sound better than CD's. " I couldn't agree with you more! |
|
#27
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ what's for dinner? |
|
#28
| ||||
| ||||
| 192k encoding Quote:
![]() Ok folks, so it looks like I'm going to re-encode ALL my CD's (that's a lot) at 192k (or 224k). Wadda ya think? |
|
#29
| |||
| |||
| Quad EL63 Beef - re your comments about the EL63's - I have heard the new Quads and I don't think they are as good. Perhaps I'd get used to them if I had them at home for long enough ... I'm not certain but I think that Quad continues to make the EL63 - mine aren't that old. Hardcore HiFi fans prefer the original Quad electrostatics! Couldn't agree more about valves (as we quaint oldworlders call them!) |
|
#30
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Quad EL63 Quote:
I guess I'd give Santa a call and... yea... I have to agree... unless you can audition things at your own home for awhile... it's really hard to see how things fit in...
__________________ what's for dinner? |
|
#31
| ||||
| ||||
| Tubes don't actually sound better, they have more resonance, and if you prefer more resonance in your music, you're going to enjoy tubes more. It's subjective. |
|
#32
| |||
| |||
| Subjective I'm not sure what Jadey means by "resonance" - but I think it's a little more complex than that! All the same it is true there's no 'right' answer in HiFi. The distortions involved in the recording process - such as the aural signature of microphones, the ambience of the recording environment, the 'mix' and so on - mean that you never get to hear the original sound. But - so what? Good HiFi is still a joy to listen to. By the way, Beef, I think you may be confusing the EL63's, which came out in the 80's, with the original Quad speakers which were made in the 60's. The EL63's were definately on sale a couple of years ago when I last looked, alongside Quad's latest speakers, the name/number of which escape me. Incidentally, can anyone explain why my G4/733 has an analogue audio output, but no input? I find the output pretty good, apart from a low level hum problem (I mean very low level) However, using a music card like Protools Digi001 puts the Mac up there with the most expensive of HIFI. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any way to speed up iTunes AAC encoding? | chicodoggy | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 4 | June 13th, 2003 02:56 AM |
| QuickTime 6.2 / iTunes AAC Encoding | spitty27 | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 2 | April 28th, 2003 07:39 PM |
| When will the iTunes encoding bug get fixed? | bookem | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 9 | April 15th, 2003 03:06 PM |
| iTunes vs. LAME Encoding | AJaX | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 3 | August 18th, 2002 06:40 PM |
| iTunes 2 is going nuts! Bloated Temp Files! | GadgetLover | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 8 | April 11th, 2002 05:45 PM |