| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Best overall (quality v. size balanced) bit-rate is ... | |||
| 128kbps | | 9 | 12.16% |
| 160kbps | | 24 | 32.43% |
| 192kbps | | 32 | 43.24% |
| higher than 192kbps | | 9 | 12.16% |
| Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#41
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: What?! Quote:
__________________ /Paragon "If I had a monkey I would take him everywhere with me. I'd also have him trained to go to the fridge and get me a beer". "It was great, it was just great, I drank the Kool-Aid". >> Power Mac • dual 867 Mhz • DVD/CD-RW • OS X 10.2 • 512 MB RAM << >> iPod 5 GB << |
|
#42
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ /Paragon "If I had a monkey I would take him everywhere with me. I'd also have him trained to go to the fridge and get me a beer". "It was great, it was just great, I drank the Kool-Aid". >> Power Mac • dual 867 Mhz • DVD/CD-RW • OS X 10.2 • 512 MB RAM << >> iPod 5 GB << |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#44
| |||
| |||
| Irony Paraong, I'm not trying to bait you or anything, I think it's cool you have a great system. I do find it ironaic though that you can drop god knows how much $ on the system, but you're encoding at only 160! I'm sure it sounds just fine, but if "just fine" were all you were looking for, a $99 CD player would do. ![]()
__________________ "You are" = you're • "It is" = it's • It's really that simple |
|
#45
| ||||
| ||||
| Actually I don't have that many mp3's, but the ones that I do have I play over my stereo. I buy my cd's instead because I think that it has superior quality. I don't do much encoding and usually it's just for checking the cd out before I buy it...or not. I will say though that it's not necessary to encode at a higher quality because of the small cable that is hooked into the mac, I wouldn't even be able to hear the sound improvement.
__________________ /Paragon "If I had a monkey I would take him everywhere with me. I'd also have him trained to go to the fridge and get me a beer". "It was great, it was just great, I drank the Kool-Aid". >> Power Mac • dual 867 Mhz • DVD/CD-RW • OS X 10.2 • 512 MB RAM << >> iPod 5 GB << |
|
#46
| |||
| |||
| Re: Why tubes are better Quote:
But back to the subject. Since the only thing I have is a Sony Clie with an MP3 player and the max memory stick is 128 MBytes, I've had to settle with 160Kbps. A 10:06 song (Symphony No. 29 A-Major K#2) takes about 11855 KBytes and allows me to fit 13 songs (~8min/song) on there with about 10 MBytes left. Of course the only thing I listen to them with are the Sony supplied headphones so I don't know how really good the songs actually do sound. Kinda like my Mac, whenever somebody complains how slow OS X is I wouldn't know because I've never seen it run on anything faster.... ![]()
__________________ G5 1.6GHz, 1.256 GBytes RAM, OS X 10.3.3, ATTO UL2D SCSI PCI, Belkin 5-port USB 2.0 PCI, LaCie 32x10x40 Firewire/USB2 CDRW, Sony Clie T665C, Palm IIIxe. 1993 Toyota T100. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any way to speed up iTunes AAC encoding? | chicodoggy | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 4 | June 13th, 2003 02:56 AM |
| QuickTime 6.2 / iTunes AAC Encoding | spitty27 | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 2 | April 28th, 2003 07:39 PM |
| When will the iTunes encoding bug get fixed? | bookem | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 9 | April 15th, 2003 03:06 PM |
| iTunes vs. LAME Encoding | AJaX | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 3 | August 18th, 2002 06:40 PM |
| iTunes 2 is going nuts! Bloated Temp Files! | GadgetLover | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 8 | April 11th, 2002 05:45 PM |