Would we see Mac .NET?

**RacerX** · April 13th, 2002, 12:28 PM

If you mean my repeated request for you to give up on the personal attacks (which you are not very good at) and return to a content based argument (which you are marginally better at than you are with personal attacks), yes I have been.

Even though you making a fool of yourself is quite entertaining, it takes the sport out of it for me. I would much rather see you embarrassed by pointing out your lack of knowledge on the subject than watch you stammer your way to your next zinger. You have been content less for the last three pages. Is that going to change in the near future (I assume you've been asking others for help because you can't handle this on your own).

**FrgMstr** · April 13th, 2002, 12:36 PM

Jeesh you dont even try and prove me wrong. The prosecution rests on that one.

I cant beleive you think i would actually ask for help with some forum convo, you really do take this stuff seriously dont you, i mean come on why on earth would i ask someone to help me argue with some bloke on a Mac forum who doesnt know his backside form his elbow.

Give me a break, the reason this thread no longer has content is because you make it so, you could easily reintroduce content by amazing me with your .Net knowledge not to mention all things computing of course.

**RacerX** · April 13th, 2002, 12:45 PM

Fraggy's idea of a content filled responce (from back on page 3)
Man you are full of yourself arent you, tell you what you can sit back in your i know all world and laugh at my posts, i dont care Ill just sit back and laught at your Ignorance, LOL.

what you gonna do now, do what you ussually do and call me Ignorant back or something and say my comments apply only to me, please.

I hadn't said anything at that point for you to get your nickers in a twist over, what was your excuse for dropping the content again?

**RacerX** · April 13th, 2002, 12:56 PM

10 minutes to respond to a single line... I hope you are spell check this post.

**FrgMstr** · April 13th, 2002, 12:59 PM

I think the quote YOU provided from ME on page 3 pretty much explains my response for me.

So why arent you reintroducing content then? come on you want discussion start it then.

**FrgMstr** · April 13th, 2002, 01:01 PM

Come on racer lets not let this degrade further by bringing spelling into it.

**RacerX** · April 13th, 2002, 01:08 PM

Lets try this again then, shall we...

by FrgMstr
you see i forgot i have to spell things out to you there i was assuming i didnt. ok when saying VS is the best out there, you said compared to ???

well
anything Borland
anything on Linux
Codewarrior
so what you go on about Web Objects, ok lets see you write a device driver in WebObjects, LMAO

Seeing as WebObjects uses many of the same development tools as Cocoa (which was Yellow Box before that, and OpenStep before that), something tells me that you just might be able to. But we were talking about development, deployment and accessing .NET. Please address these issues in your next fun filled post.

who cares if its won awards lets see how many people actually use it compared to VS.

But you said Second to NONE, you did say that didn't you? By who's standards? The world is full of lets sees, WebObjects is proven.

I think that is about where you stopped posting content, why not respond to these points first and then we can try something harder (we don't want you to throw another three page temper tantrum again now do we).

(And sorry, I wouldn't bring up the spelling thing again... that was to low. Again sorry)

**FrgMstr** · April 13th, 2002, 01:13 PM

Like i said before my knowledge of webobjects is very limited (i.e. i know nothing about it) however i do feel that since its name is WebObjects i would be very surprised if you could develop device drivers with it. (if i am wrong and WebObjects is used to develop a broad range of software such as the purpose of Visual studio i stand corrected, in which case we can then get on with comparing it with VS)