|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Sucks to be Macromedia The Press Release Macromedia to give Adobe $2.8 Million for patent infringement. This verdict came out of nowhere. Macromedia hasn't been doing too well financially lately. I feel sorry for them. But in reality, they have been ripping off Adobe pretty bad. I have to say, I use Flash MX, and I actually like their solution better than the tabbed palletes. All of the palette names line up vertically and you don't have to look left to right as you scan down the list. Why they couldn't just take 10 minutes to come up with this instead of ripping off the tabbed palettes, I will never know.
__________________ What is going on at this place? |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| All I have to say is: AHAHHAHAHAHHAHA. I cannot wait to get LiveMotion 2.0 and toss out Flash MX! |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Sucks to be Macromedia Quote:
I used to worry about Flash 4 and 5 crashing on me constantly under OS9, this new version seems really stable though.
__________________ Current Setup: Quicksilver G4 733mhz ? OSX 10.2.4 ? 640mb ram ? 120 GB total HD space ? 19" LaCie Monitor ? Wacom Intuos Tablet ? Agfa Snapscan ? Canon BjC-2100 Printer ? Sony Digital 8 Camcorder ? Fuij FinePix Camera |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Didn't Macromedia also sue Adobe for some copyright crap too? |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| No impact at all... Really, $2.8 mil is chump change. And Macromedia really won't have to change anything. Macromedia was very wise to change the pallettes in the MX series apps. Not only are they easier to minimize now and reduce clutter, but they in no way infringe upon Adobe's "patent" (although, if whoever wrote Painter was smart enough to copyright it's pallette functionality, MM could be in trouble with them too). With regard to MM's counter suit to Adobe, that still has yet to be decided... And Nummi, I'd think twice about investing a lot of time and money in to LiveMotion 2. Already Adobe has transitioned the LM development team to the After Effects team, in what seems to a disbandment. Insiders say that Adobe realizes it can't compete with Flash, and that LM sales were very disappointing... Personally, I liked LM2, but there's one major reason I won't upgrade to it. The "preview" mode under OS X is incredibly slow. So slow that you can't really effectively preview anything. How the app shipped with this big of a glitch is beyond me. Stick with Flash. It's the real deal...
__________________ Powerbook G4 17"/1.5ghz/1GB RAM - OS X iBook 12"/1.2ghz/512MB RAM - OS X AMD 2200 XP/512MB RAM/WinXP Visit OS X Factor - OS X News & Resources |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| But I do think Macromedia is quite copying Microsoft this time. Have you seen Office v.X?? It is vertical line up palette names!! And I am pretty sure Office v.X came earlier than any MX apps. Right??
__________________ What is a signature? Last edited by ddma; May 5th, 2002 at 01:21 PM. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Simple fact is that Adobe has patents for their way of docking different palettes, Macromedia copied it, Adobe asked Macromedia to cease doing it, and when Adobe thought it was enough waiting for Macromedia to comply they filed a lawsuit: And they won. Clearly. Macromedia's short counter attack was just that. They thought to themselves that just defending themselves wasn't enough. Well, bad for Macromedia, right? *If* Microsoft has patents for the vertical lineup of such titles and *if* Macromedia now hurts those patents, they're in new trouble. Question is: How else can you do it? Should Macromedia invent yet a new way? *I* think this is a simple matter that should already be covered by the Human Interface Guidelines. I know, I'm thinking a bit too simple in such cases, but I'd have said: Adobe, let Apple make this an Aqua interface guideline for docking palettes, take some money from Apple for licensing the technology/idea and let it all be well in the world. But the case, whether you like Macromedia or Adobe more, is clear. And that's what software patents are for, right? You have to somehow secure your intellectual property. It would make no sense at all to have a patent that secures this and then let Macromedia copy it like that without making them cease. The philosophical me says: To hell with software patents like that. Let good ideas flourish and take the credit for them! Adobe would have a much better image right now.
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| The preview was slow in LM1 in OS 9 too. I would always export to web browser anyway. I think Adobe should stick with LiveMotion. Or maybe combine LM2 and AfterEffects, just make them one app. I would love that 2.8 million... yeah, that is pocket change to these evil corprations. But I am still laughing. HA HAH HA HAH ! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Macromedia No Show | boomw | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 2 | January 7th, 2002 06:43 PM |
| Allaire (macromedia) Homesite: Is it finally here? | cpk0 | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 4 | November 18th, 2001 03:00 PM |
| Adobe vs Macromedia lawsuit details --> | uoba | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 2 | October 24th, 2001 04:54 AM |
| AARRRGHH!! Macromedia vs Adobe SHOCKER!!! | uoba | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 12 | October 23rd, 2001 01:20 AM |
| Email Campaign For Macromedia | Anxietyboy | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 1 | October 19th, 2000 04:12 PM |