image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old May 3rd, 2002, 08:09 AM
dlookus's Avatar
Disgruntled user
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dlookus is on a distinguished road
Sucks to be Macromedia

The Press Release

Macromedia to give Adobe $2.8 Million for patent infringement.

This verdict came out of nowhere. Macromedia hasn't been doing too well financially lately. I feel sorry for them. But in reality, they have been ripping off Adobe pretty bad.

I have to say, I use Flash MX, and I actually like their solution better than the tabbed palletes. All of the palette names line up vertically and you don't have to look left to right as you scan down the list.

Why they couldn't just take 10 minutes to come up with this instead of ripping off the tabbed palettes, I will never know.
__________________
What is going on at this place?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 3rd, 2002, 09:01 AM
Nummi_G4's Avatar
New Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Concord, Ohio
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nummi_G4 is on a distinguished road
All I have to say is: AHAHHAHAHAHHAHA. I cannot wait to get LiveMotion 2.0 and toss out Flash MX!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 3rd, 2002, 10:32 AM
rinse's Avatar
www.visualrinse.com
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 777
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rinse is on a distinguished road
Re: Sucks to be Macromedia

Quote:
Originally posted by dlookus

I have to say, I use Flash MX, and I actually like their solution better than the tabbed palletes. All of the palette names line up vertically and you don't have to look left to right as you scan down the list.
After using MX for the last couple weeks, I must agree... I like the new system and really dig MX as a whole... It is a bit slow in 9, but runs like a champ in X...

I used to worry about Flash 4 and 5 crashing on me constantly under OS9, this new version seems really stable though.
__________________
Current Setup:
Quicksilver G4 733mhz ? OSX 10.2.4 ? 640mb ram ? 120 GB total HD space ? 19" LaCie Monitor ? Wacom Intuos Tablet ? Agfa Snapscan ? Canon BjC-2100 Printer ? Sony Digital 8 Camcorder ? Fuij FinePix Camera
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 3rd, 2002, 10:41 AM
Nummi_G4's Avatar
New Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Concord, Ohio
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nummi_G4 is on a distinguished road
Didn't Macromedia also sue Adobe for some copyright crap too?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 3rd, 2002, 05:45 PM
serpicolugnut's Avatar
OS X Supreme Being
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Land of the free, home of the braves
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
serpicolugnut is on a distinguished road
No impact at all...

Really, $2.8 mil is chump change. And Macromedia really won't have to change anything. Macromedia was very wise to change the pallettes in the MX series apps. Not only are they easier to minimize now and reduce clutter, but they in no way infringe upon Adobe's "patent" (although, if whoever wrote Painter was smart enough to copyright it's pallette functionality, MM could be in trouble with them too).

With regard to MM's counter suit to Adobe, that still has yet to be decided...

And Nummi, I'd think twice about investing a lot of time and money in to LiveMotion 2. Already Adobe has transitioned the LM development team to the After Effects team, in what seems to a disbandment. Insiders say that Adobe realizes it can't compete with Flash, and that LM sales were very disappointing...

Personally, I liked LM2, but there's one major reason I won't upgrade to it. The "preview" mode under OS X is incredibly slow. So slow that you can't really effectively preview anything. How the app shipped with this big of a glitch is beyond me.

Stick with Flash. It's the real deal...
__________________
Powerbook G4 17"/1.5ghz/1GB RAM - OS X
iBook 12"/1.2ghz/512MB RAM - OS X
AMD 2200 XP/512MB RAM/WinXP
Visit OS X Factor - OS X News & Resources
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 5th, 2002, 12:57 PM
ddma's Avatar
The Most Stupid Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 670
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ddma is on a distinguished road
But I do think Macromedia is quite copying Microsoft this time. Have you seen Office v.X?? It is vertical line up palette names!! And I am pretty sure Office v.X came earlier than any MX apps. Right??

__________________
What is a signature?

Last edited by ddma; May 5th, 2002 at 01:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 5th, 2002, 01:07 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,315
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
Simple fact is that Adobe has patents for their way of docking different palettes, Macromedia copied it, Adobe asked Macromedia to cease doing it, and when Adobe thought it was enough waiting for Macromedia to comply they filed a lawsuit: And they won. Clearly. Macromedia's short counter attack was just that. They thought to themselves that just defending themselves wasn't enough. Well, bad for Macromedia, right? *If* Microsoft has patents for the vertical lineup of such titles and *if* Macromedia now hurts those patents, they're in new trouble. Question is: How else can you do it? Should Macromedia invent yet a new way?

*I* think this is a simple matter that should already be covered by the Human Interface Guidelines. I know, I'm thinking a bit too simple in such cases, but I'd have said: Adobe, let Apple make this an Aqua interface guideline for docking palettes, take some money from Apple for licensing the technology/idea and let it all be well in the world.

But the case, whether you like Macromedia or Adobe more, is clear. And that's what software patents are for, right? You have to somehow secure your intellectual property. It would make no sense at all to have a patent that secures this and then let Macromedia copy it like that without making them cease.

The philosophical me says: To hell with software patents like that. Let good ideas flourish and take the credit for them! Adobe would have a much better image right now.
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 5th, 2002, 09:01 PM
Nummi_G4's Avatar
New Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Concord, Ohio
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nummi_G4 is on a distinguished road
The preview was slow in LM1 in OS 9 too. I would always export to web browser anyway. I think Adobe should stick with LiveMotion. Or maybe combine LM2 and AfterEffects, just make them one app. I would love that

2.8 million... yeah, that is pocket change to these evil corprations. But I am still laughing. HA HAH HA HAH !
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Macromedia No Show boomw Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 2 January 7th, 2002 06:43 PM
Allaire (macromedia) Homesite: Is it finally here? cpk0 Mac OS X System & Mac Software 4 November 18th, 2001 03:00 PM
Adobe vs Macromedia lawsuit details --> uoba Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 2 October 24th, 2001 04:54 AM
AARRRGHH!! Macromedia vs Adobe SHOCKER!!! uoba Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 12 October 23rd, 2001 01:20 AM
Email Campaign For Macromedia Anxietyboy Mac OS X System & Mac Software 1 October 19th, 2000 04:12 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.