image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old May 13th, 2002, 10:04 PM
Matrix Agent's Avatar
Masochist Mascot
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Matrix Agent is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb MOSR predicts 100% increase in proc speed by MWNY.

Make your own decision.
__________________
Phil Wood

iBook466 320Mb Airport Base Station
Cable Modem OS X.1.4
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 13th, 2002, 11:01 PM
homer's Avatar
Safety Inspector
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Duff Gardens
Posts: 418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
homer is on a distinguished road
The images currently in my mind are of porcine aviators and frozen precipitation in Hades.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 13th, 2002, 11:56 PM
satanicpoptart's Avatar
X
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 660
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
satanicpoptart is on a distinguished road
homer... i read that for a minute confused, then started laughing uncontrolably... that is really funny
__________________
setup:
dual 500 G4, 768 ram, 30 and 80 gigHD, dvd cdrw, radeon 9000 w/ 19 inch KDS, 17 inch Apple Studio Display
Powerbook g3 "Prismo", 400 mhz, 128 ram 6 gigHD, dvd
AIM-ihatestuf

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 14th, 2002, 12:09 AM
homer's Avatar
Safety Inspector
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Duff Gardens
Posts: 418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
homer is on a distinguished road
Talking

Glad you enjoyed it. I had a good chuckle at the thought of an announcement about 100% increase in speed by July. And then I wept.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 14th, 2002, 12:41 AM
simX's Avatar
Unofficial Mac Genius
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,183
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
simX is on a distinguished road
I think what they MEANT was overall system performance, balancing everything from system bus speed to memory speed to processor speed to amount of L2/L3 cache.

It's still pretty bogus anyway.
__________________
-- simX

Get Memory Usage Getter, the only Mac OS X utility that graphically displays the memory usage of your open processes! http://homepage.mac.com/simx/

450 MHz G4 Cube | 15" flat-panel Apple Studio Display | 896 MB RAM | Que! Fire 12x10x32x FireWire CD-RW | OS X 10.1.5 Build 5S66 | Mac OS 9.2.2 | Telex M-560 Microphone | Epson Stylus Color 777 | TI-Graph Link USB | Pro Speakers/Mouse/Keyboard | Airport card | iPod

"Some people's minds are like cement: all mixed up and permanently set..." -- Andrew Welch, el Presidente, Ambrosia Software, Inc.

"You know that first hit of heroin is free." -- Scott McNealy, Sun Microsystem's CEO, on Microsoft's .NET .

"The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners." -- Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 14th, 2002, 02:28 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,075
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
You may think what you want, but *if* there are G4's at 1.5 GHz by July, *if* Apple uses 266 or 333 MHz bus speed and *if* Apple uses dual processors for mid and high end machines along with faster harddrives and GeForce 4Ti cards, this *will* be a 100% speed increase at the very *least*.

Also, I don't believe MacOSRumors is that bad. They may have posted rumours with less credibility than others, but they've also posted real stuff. We'll see when they post more about that.

It seems clear by now that the NY PowerMacs will use the PPC 7470, which should bring quite some performance, comparing to the 7450 MHz to MHz. Which is good. I hope we'll really see the speed increase, and I wonder how far back the PowerBooks will fall by Autumn, as I don't want to buy a PowerMac. I want a Ti at 1.2 or more GHz. 7460, 7470?
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 14th, 2002, 06:09 AM
vanguard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 531
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
vanguard is on a distinguished road
Here's the relevant portion from their site:

Quote:
Oh, and one last thing.....

If you've been drooling over next-generation processors like the G5, and wish Apple would toss the tired old translucent PowerMac design for something more modern that the current Quicksilver incarnation, this summer will have you very pleased indeed. We can't promise multi-processor 2GHz G5s, but we can promise a performance leap of more than 100% in processing speed alone over the existing PowerMac....and major leaps in almost every category on the motherboard. Stay tuned for more exclusive details, only here on MOSR :-)
I don't know if it's true. I'm guessing it is. Maybe all my calls for a move to x86 will be proven to be dumb ideas? I'd like that.

At some point the processor will become fast enough and the system performance will be limited by something else. Whenever a faster Intel processor is released it's greeted with a yawn from the PC guys. That's because their systems are already so fast. Wouldn't it be cool if we were there but the end of the summer?

Vanguard

PS Maybe I'm dreaming. If so, don't wake me.
__________________
500 mhz iceBook- 384mb ram, combo drive
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 14th, 2002, 06:51 AM
uoba's Avatar
Re: member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
uoba is on a distinguished road
I truly hope so...

Your right, getting to that point where speed increases only affect big apps for 3d and such, and the system doesn't need anymore... I too would be extremely happy.

By the MOSR do promise this increase, so it must be true!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does more RAM increase 10.2 speed? Durbrow Hardware & Peripherals 7 October 24th, 2002 08:57 AM
Will Apple really be able to increase speed? elektrobank Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 5 September 28th, 2000 09:09 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.