Follow us on...
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook
Register
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 8 of 17
  1. #1
    hulkaros's Avatar
    hulkaros is offline The Incredible...
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    MacLand
    Posts
    1,986
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Lightbulb Could this be the New Mac architecture?

    AMD - nVidia - Apple...

    I CAN'T say from where I heard it but let's just say that more likely THIS is the real deal! And NO I'm NOT making this up!


    NOTE: If this thing IS going to happen, I prefer AMD and NOT intel and also I hope Apple will have all the saying and not other clone-makers... including AMD and nVidia partners! Also, I wanted Apple NOT to chose the x86 architecture and give a shot to quad G4 boxes instead

    I REALLY hope my source is ALL wrong, really
    I find your lack of faith... Disturbing!

    Windows is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical shell for an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition

    ...not the sharpest knife in the drawer...

  2. #2
    Sogni's Avatar
    Sogni is offline *gone*
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    1,574
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rumor or not, let's say it would happen...

    I really don't belive it would be x86 architecture - I think it would be either Intel or AMD making a processor FOR Apple (ala IBM PowerPC G3 when they where ALSO making x86 processors for PCs), not Apple using an "Off-the shelf" processor from Intel or AMD...

    At least... I hope not!
    I'm not around here (much) anymore...
    Look for me in friendlier places.

  3. #3
    jocknerd is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    103
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    <quote>I really don't belive it would be x86 architecture - I think it would be either Intel or AMD making a processor FOR Apple (ala IBM PowerPC G3 when they where ALSO making x86 processors for PCs), not Apple using an "Off-the shelf" processor from Intel or AMD...</quote>

    If AMD were to produce a CPU for Apple, it would probably be very similar if not the same, as the X86 processor. Cost containment would be the reason. Which would be good for Apple as well. A less expensive processor makes for a less expensive computer. If they do go with AMD and use the same processor, the bios and firmware would still be for Apple.

    So OS X would still require an Apple to run. Although I'm still unsure if this is a good thing or not. I know a LOT of people that would drop Windows in a second if they could run OS X on their PC. It really comes down to whether selling enough copies of OS X for PC's would make up for the loss in Apple hardware sales. I honestly think it would be possible for Apple to sell OS X for PC's without harming their hardware sales.

  4. #4
    jocknerd is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    103
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Originally posted by Tormente
    I really don't belive it would be x86 architecture - I think it would be either Intel or AMD making a processor FOR Apple (ala IBM PowerPC G3 when they where ALSO making x86 processors for PCs), not Apple using an "Off-the shelf" processor from Intel or AMD...
    If AMD were to produce a CPU for Apple, it would probably be very similar if not the same, as the X86 processor. Cost containment would be the reason. Which would be good for Apple as well. A less expensive processor makes for a less expensive computer. If they do go with AMD and use the same processor, the bios and firmware would still be for Apple.

    So OS X would still require an Apple to run. Although I'm still unsure if this is a good thing or not. I know a LOT of people that would drop Windows in a second if they could run OS X on their PC. It really comes down to whether selling enough copies of OS X for PC's would make up for the loss in Apple hardware sales. I honestly think it would be possible for Apple to sell OS X for PC's without harming their hardware sales.

  5. #5
    Rhino_G3's Avatar
    Rhino_G3 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Lyons, KS
    Posts
    844
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Regardless... if apple did use an x86 architecture clones WILL appear. Bios and firmware are easy to flash. If it needed a special chip to run imagine how fast it would appear on ebay. I, for one, would actualy build one. Not to take buisiness from apple... just to say that I did it.

  6. #6
    fryke's Avatar
    fryke is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    macosx.com
    Posts
    14,287
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 120 Times in 109 Posts
    AMD, nVidia and Apple ARE working together. In a consortium about bus architecture. It has nothing to do with Apple choosing an AMD chip for Macintosh computers.
    Mac user since 1987. Running Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion on a MacBook Air 11" & an iMac 27" and whatever's newest for my iPhone 4s, iPad 3 and AppleTV 2.
    Apple Certified System Administrator 10.6, Apple Sales Professional 2008-2011, Apple Certified Mac Technician.

  7. #7
    mdnky's Avatar
    mdnky is offline [Bobs/Prog/Design:~] mod%
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA - USA
    Posts
    2,676
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts

    Re: Could this be the New Mac architecture?

    Originally posted by hulkaros
    AMD - nVidia - Apple...

    I CAN'T say from where I heard it but let's just say that more likely THIS is the real deal! And NO I'm NOT making this up!


    NOTE: If this thing IS going to happen, I prefer AMD and NOT intel and also I hope Apple will have all the saying and not other clone-makers... including AMD and nVidia partners! Also, I wanted Apple NOT to chose the x86 architecture and give a shot to quad G4 boxes instead

    I REALLY hope my source is ALL wrong, really
    And I should buy this BS because you think? Or heard somewhere? It's a figment of you imagination. Show some proof next time.

    On a lighter side, I do recall hearing of those three companies playing a part in a group on a new bus architecture...kinda like the many numerous other "standards" and technology groups Apple belong to.
    .
    | My Homepage | Restore the Pledge |

    • MacBook Pro i7 2.66GHz 15" HD matte, 4GB, 500GB 7200RPM, OS X 10.6
    • MacBook Pro Core2Duo 2.33GHz 15" matte, 2GB DDR2 RAM, 500GB 7200RPM, DL Superdrive, OS X 10.6
    • Apple 23" Cinema HD Display, Apple Slim-Alum Keyboard, Apple BT Alum Keyboard, Magic Mouse
    • iPhone 4, iPhone 3G, iPhone 8GB, iPod Nano 16GB, iPod Photo 30GB, Nikon D50, Nikon L6, Epson 3490, Epson R1800, OkiData C5500N


  8. #8
    fryke's Avatar
    fryke is offline Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    macosx.com
    Posts
    14,287
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 120 Times in 109 Posts
    Yes, as recently as ONE BLOODY POST ABOVE YOURS!
    Mac user since 1987. Running Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion on a MacBook Air 11" & an iMac 27" and whatever's newest for my iPhone 4s, iPad 3 and AppleTV 2.
    Apple Certified System Administrator 10.6, Apple Sales Professional 2008-2011, Apple Certified Mac Technician.

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. A bit of nostalgia: A Salute to Mac OS X
    By simX in forum Apple News, Rumors & Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: March 24th, 2005, 06:45 AM
  2. HP Photosmart 1315 and USB Print Sharing
    By zwheeloc in forum Mac Classic System & Software
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: February 6th, 2003, 08:20 PM
  3. apps list
    By Mac Osxtopus in forum Mac OS X System & Mac Software
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: May 29th, 2002, 11:31 AM
  4. Apple: Forget XP, try the Mac
    By tagliatelle in forum Bob's Place
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 25th, 2001, 06:12 AM
  5. Netscape 6.1 Profile Transfer from Mac OS 9.2.1 to Mac OS X
    By chemistry_geek in forum Apple News, Rumors & Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 12th, 2001, 05:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •