|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| What apps are ready
What applications are ready for the Intel-Based macs? I know of a few, and on project osx86 they mention that all the apps bundled with OS X Tiger are now universal binaries the ones that i know of: coconut battery Photobooth
__________________ Its not the machine that makes you creative and get a better job, its what you can do with it. 17" MacBook Pro HD 4 GB Non Video Pod Nano Blue |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
__________________ 15" MacBook Pro Mac OS X v10.5.1 2.33GHz, 2GB RAM, 120GB HDD 5G iPod 60GB |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
Wow, thats a lot of programs out so far, still waiting on the big ones though, from Asypr, Adobe & Quark (all the programs i use) Knowing Quark, they won't update to x86 till 2007 and Adobe who knows, i just hope they offer a free update so it runs without emulation
__________________ Its not the machine that makes you creative and get a better job, its what you can do with it. 17" MacBook Pro HD 4 GB Non Video Pod Nano Blue |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
|
Adobe have already pledged that they'll be on board "from the beginning", which I take to mean that they'll have at least a set of patches out when the first Intel Macs are released. Aspyr have a whole page on their site about their order of priorities for the transition. They'll be starting with the Sims and Sims2 (apparently they've already got these titles done) and then working their way through their more popular recent titles first. As for Quark, well, I haven't heard anything.
__________________ - iMac G5 1.8GHZ 17" | SuperDrive | 160GB | 512MB | Airport Extreme | Bluetooth Keyboard & Mouse | Wacom Intuos II - Pentax *ist DL - JVC MiniDV Camcorder - Airport Express - iPod Nano 1gb white |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
I imagine most indie developers will get their apps out first. The only problem with Universal Binaries is there is no easy way to have support for 10.2.X users, so 99% of the apps will be requiring 10.3.9 or greater. There is a way to have the universal binary support for 10.2.X, but you have to build a separate version and use another tool to combine it...
|
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Its not the machine that makes you creative and get a better job, its what you can do with it. 17" MacBook Pro HD 4 GB Non Video Pod Nano Blue |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| http://www.luxology.com/press/releas..._MacIntel.aspx Twenty minute port. Good thing they're using XCode. Quark. Who cares? Quark is dead to me. Adobe will probably saunter in around mid 2007. Adobe's CEO followed up on the Intel announcement by saying that the transition will be longer and more trouble (for Adobe) than Steve implies. They must not be using Xcode. While I'd certainly like Adobe to be 100% ready when I buy a Mactel, it's not that big a deal if they're not. The Adobe apps run great on my DP 27. G5. From what I gather, Rosetta and the Mactel hardware come 2007 should run every bit as well even if it's not ported. If that's true, I won't complain for a while. I'm assuming ALL of Apple's apps are 100% ready to go. I don't want to be at the Apple store 18 months from now, ready to drop $4,000 on a fully loaded Quad Xeon whatever only to find out Final Cut is running thru Rosetta. Certainly that's not the case. Yes?
__________________ "You are" = you're • "It is" = it's • It's really that simple |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
|
If _Apple_ weren't ready, _that'd_ look bad. So I guess they won't look bad, and will be ready. I'm glad my Finder already shows me that BBEdit is "intel, powerpc" ...
__________________ iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1 MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1 Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1 MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7 iPhone 3GS 32 GB white. Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|