|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
But to dangle it in front of us like that is just plain frustrating.. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| I might have to fork over the $500 and become a Apple Developer. Leapord looks awesome. While I use virtual desktops now with a variety of various utilities, I want something that is better and spaces is it! |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
If you are NOT a developer of software for the Macintosh platform, then the WWDC was not aimed at you. Steve didn't dangle anything in front of your face -- you simply peeked into a room that had nothing to do with you or your use of the Macintosh at this moment in time.
__________________ Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.4 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k http://www.jeffhoppe.com |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| x Last edited by Mobius Rex; August 10th, 2006 at 10:17 AM. |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| Tiger i think was more impresive that Panther...and thats why I was an early adopter of it. Leopard looks cool and all that, but TimeMachine i really dont have a use for on a laptop, and Spaces is cool, but I can live without it. If I were to have a Mac Desktop, either a Mini, iMac or Mac Pro, yea i can see a big use for it. Spaces seems good for people with small screens doing a lot of different work, i was hoping for something like this for a while however, cause all *nix desktops that i've used has the 4 different desktop screens and it is cool.
__________________ Its not the machine that makes you creative and get a better job, its what you can do with it. 17" MacBook Pro HD 4 GB Non Video Pod Nano Blue |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| I upgraded to Tiger immediately, mainly because as a developer, I want to be on the cutting edge. As a user, though, I wish I'd stuck with Panther. It was faster and smoother, and best of all, it didn't have anything as half-baked as Spotlight. I'll probably get Leopard immediately for the same reason. Core Animation sounds pretty neat. For someone like me who generally has all his disks packed to the gills, Time Machine is pointless. I would definitely appreciate Spaces, but it's not as flexible as I'd hoped. For example, it seems like you can't have one application split across multiple spaces. I use BBEdit Lite for everything; programming, web design, writing, reading, and even web browsing (sometimes I write my forum posts in it). I'd like to have it accessible in just about every space I create, with different windows in each. Doesn't look like Spaces will allow that. Some third-party virtual desktop apps do allow that, but they're all a little quirky in their own right. I think it would take OS-level integration to get it to work really well, which is why I'm really disappointed that Apple took the easy way out. Of course, we don't know everything about Leopard yet. There are probably some more big things Apple has under their hat for now. I still consider 10.3.8 to be the height of OS X. Fast, stable, refined. |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| I'm a little underwhelmed at the Leopard sneek Preview. All they have shown us is a couple of new Apps (Time Machine, Spaces, ...) some App updates (Mail etc etc). Not really seen any major OS changes yet (Finder ...) I think they have still a lot of work to do in the next 7-8 months. One thing I think is missing from the little we have seen so far Is an good "Out of Office" that integrates Mail and iCal (and OSX Server if you have it). I'm using a Squirrel Mail plug-in at the moment, but it does not have that "Apple" simplicity. If Apple want the Mac to be adopted in the work environment they need to get this sorted. ie: Just put your vacation dates in iCal, click an "Out of Office reply" button, enter your reply text. Done! When you vacation passes the reply stops. It cant be that hard for them to do this, can it? Maybe it will be part of the new iCal Server on Leopard server??? Oh. another thing NEEDED is "Address book sharing" without .mac. An Address book server that automatically updates all the local LAN Mac's address book's and updates itself from the same local LAN Mac's ie: you have a list of clients in the address book on all your LAN Mac's. Client "A" changes his address, One person updates their Address book and POW! everyone's address book is updated. These ideas would really work in the day to day running of a company. Fancy Templates in Mail that you can drop pictures into frames are pretty cool, but they are not going to make my life any easier. Just my 2p worth
__________________ Apple user since about OS6 |
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
| out of office replies are the worst thing period.
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adobe CS3 due in mid-2007 | Mikuro | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 11 | March 27th, 2006 07:23 AM |
| Leopard screenshots? | kainjow | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 15 | October 12th, 2005 11:01 AM |
| What Features would you like to see in Leopard? | RGrphc2 | Bob's Place | 39 | August 4th, 2005 01:13 PM |
| No Next-Gen PowerBooks Until 2007? | pismo | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 18 | June 14th, 2005 01:13 PM |
| OS X Leopard | pismo | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 53 | June 8th, 2005 02:17 PM |