image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #9  
Old September 12th, 2006, 06:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mindbend is on a distinguished road
Ok, right about the HDMI, but where is Apple expecting you to get HD video (720P or better) to run through the iTV? (Since iTunes won't get it to you).

Or maybe they're just planning ahead.
__________________
"You are" = you're • "It is" = it's • It's really that simple
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old September 12th, 2006, 06:27 PM
MnM MnM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 75
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
MnM is on a distinguished road
I believe full HD is supported but not sure( HD trailer playing from apple.com to your tv). But my problem with quality is the movies you download from the ITMS. Its only 640...if you stream that to your TV and then stretch it on a 42 or 50 inch plasama its probably not that great.

Should have been full HD support and a built in video resizer to resize videos specifically for your ipod. This way your tv gets good quality and you don't kill space on your ipod.
__________________
"Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do."

Last edited by MnM; September 12th, 2006 at 06:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old September 12th, 2006, 06:49 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,337
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
I'll use my MacBook instead, thank you. Connects to my video beamer just fine, and even with iTV, my MacBook would still have to be running and provide the movie. FrontRow works fine on my MacBook - and things look gorgeous on the beamer. But I guess there _is_ a market for this. Desktop computer users mostly, of course.
__________________
macnews.net.tc is active again.
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old September 12th, 2006, 09:24 PM
ksv's Avatar
ksv ksv is offline
liberal socialist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,000
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ksv is on a distinguished road
Where's the TV tuner and the optical drive? :P Without those, the device is pretty useless unless you buy all your music and movies from iTunes.
__________________
leo at code.coop

Co-operatives are private corporations based on the values of self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity and solidarity.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old September 12th, 2006, 09:50 PM
Captain Code's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,108
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Captain Code will become famous soon enough
I noticed they just said 802.11 networking, not 802.11g in the stream of the event. I think they think they'll be using 802.11n by then, so new Airports probably in the works as well. I don't think you'd get good performance with g since it already can't play an avi video without crapping out, at least in my experience.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old September 12th, 2006, 09:52 PM
Captain Code's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,108
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Captain Code will become famous soon enough
The thing has optical audio out so it supports Dolby 5.1 or better which is great. I guess the movies they sell on the store are going to be Dolby Digital.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old September 12th, 2006, 10:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank The Cheese is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mindbend View Post
IN short, it will look way better than SD, but nowhere near as good as it could.
will it? standard def is 768x576 (PAL), so I'd say it would look about the same, perhaps even slightly worse.

looks great, but I still plan on buying a Mac Mini instead, because I don't want to have my iMac on and doing nothing just to stream video to my TV.
__________________
Podwatch: Podcast Reviews: Blog | Podcast

iPhone: 8GB, 1.1.3, Unlocked | MacBook Pro: 2Ghz CoreDuo, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.2 | Apple TV: 160GB
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old September 12th, 2006, 10:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mindbend is on a distinguished road
True, the specs for SD may indicate something better, but we all know that in reality American (digital) SD is a horrific mpeg-2 transmission, which won't hold up nearly as well as h264 or even a nicely compressed mpeg4.

I watched last season of Lost on my 20" iMAc (dragged it into the bedroom like a TV). From about 8-10 ft away, even 320x240 looked surprisingly decent. I was really surprised by how watchable it was. In some ways it was better than digital cable thanks to cleaner compression, but obviously the 320x240 held it back. But keep in mind also that average old-school NTSC TV won't show you anywhere near all of those SD lines, so in that sense 640x480 on an LCD will be noticeably better than SD on an older TV.
__________________
"You are" = you're • "It is" = it's • It's really that simple
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Final Cut 6 and Final Cut Extreme OraliusJohnosn Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 5 January 6th, 2006 02:50 PM
Final Cut Pro 5 thegryphon42 Design & Media 0 July 27th, 2005 07:30 PM
10.1 Final swizcore Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 19 September 21st, 2001 02:28 AM
Not really final ...or so it seems! ElGreco Mac OS X System & Mac Software 3 April 22nd, 2001 09:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.