image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old January 26th, 2003, 12:23 PM
moav's Avatar
Hunter of Muffins
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Darsey, CO
Posts: 128
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
moav is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up Cell phone built into Powerbooks(true wireless)

I am assuming that sometime later this year either 10.3 or the new powerbooks will be the first laptops with built in cellular capabilities. With most carriers offering web access through their phones it would be relatively easy for Apple to add a small software or hardware based sim cell phone card into each powerbook. We already have the screen, antenna, battery, keyboard that is needed. This would truly make Apple Powerbook products revolutionary. With the advent of QT 7 around the corner with built in video conferencing capabilities and the new Dokomo pact Apple's users could virtually hold video conferences on the road at the beach or in their cars. From a simple phone call through our powerbooks or holding a video conference with manufacturers Apple will have brought true mobility once and for to their customers. With the ability to add or purchase region specific software sim cards for the new powerbook line, boundries do not exist.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 26th, 2003, 12:50 PM
senne's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
senne is on a distinguished road
another example of people choosing wrong Thread-titles, but ohwell...


cool idea though!
__________________
mac user since 1985
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 26th, 2003, 02:39 PM
AdmiralAK's Avatar
Simply Daemonic
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Classified
Posts: 5,787
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
AdmiralAK is on a distinguished road
yeah, misleading thread title!

On a side issue having builtin mobile connection on a powerbook is a BAD idea, why ? technologies change, but mac laptops and mac computers are built to last.

GSM is the current leading standard followed by CDMA 1x. Apple would have to incorporate both technologies in their cell-enables powerbook. Also CDMA carriers would HAVE to have SIM cards because there are already hassles trying to activate phones NOT bought on their network, imagine a laptop, and imagine if there were competitior's laptops

I think having cell phones that have bluetooth built in and laptops with bluetooth built in is a better wireless solution
__________________
<<------------------------------>>
Seid ihr bereit fuer Club Admiralty ????
Club Admiralty: Http://www.club-admiralty.com
Copyright 1996-present
Bonified Gadget Geek :-)
<<------------------------------>>
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 26th, 2003, 02:41 PM
kenny's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kenny is on a distinguished road
Actually, that's almost what's happening with the new powerbooks. They've got Bluetooth built in, which, in turn, allows communication with whatever mobile phone you have (assuming it does BT). Use GPRS with this, and you're there. No need to build mobile phone tech into the powerbook (which is not where it really belongs anyway)...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 26th, 2003, 06:54 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,337
Thanks: 2
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
Yup. The PowerBook is the digital mobile hub. The mobile phone is the medium to the mobile networks (or one of them, assuming that WiFi takes off even more). And Bluetooth is the 'cable' without wires. I'm actively using GPRS connections with my T68i and TiBook, and I WISH my TiBook had Bluetooth built in, because the stick sticks out and I have to disconnect it when bagging the 'book.

It's time I buy that 12" PowerBook, I guess.
__________________
macnews.net.tc is active again.
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 26th, 2003, 07:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern Kali (USA)
Posts: 434
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dusky is on a distinguished road
Quote:
I'm actively using GPRS connections with my T68i and TiBook'
That's one thing I'd want to do when away from home: log on to the net from my iBook. Do you have to pay extra fees to your service provider, or are you simply using regular dial-up?
__________________
Dusky
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 26th, 2003, 07:40 PM
symphonix's Avatar
Scratch &amp; Sniff Committee
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: The Australian Jungles
Posts: 4,025
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
symphonix is on a distinguished road
Besides, you'd be surprised where you get wireless coverage now anyway. Luthansa have recently begun trialling putting 802.11b points in their aircraft, so that laptop users can have cable-speed internet at 30,000 ft.

You won't be seeing a GPRS phone built in to any Mac in the forseeable future. Apple announced an alliance with Sony-Ericson at a MacWorld last year, and it wouldn't be good business practice to throw that out the window.

Also, GPRS is relatively expensive to implement. The 802.11g standard that Apple is implementing in Airport Extreme (which doesn't become a standard until later this year) re-uses the chipsets from 802.11a hardware which means they can build it cheaply. It gets the range of 802.11a on the band used by 802.11b. It is backward compatible, so 802.11g access points could replace 802.11b ones without any of the client computers or antenna hardware needing to be updated.
And the base station can work as a repeater, to fill in coverage gaps without needing to be wired into the network.

I'm confident GPRS will catch on more in the future, but for now the more established wireless technologies are the most effective.
__________________
- iMac G5 1.8GHZ 17" | SuperDrive | 160GB | 512MB | Airport Extreme | Bluetooth Keyboard & Mouse | Wacom Intuos II
- Pentax *ist DL - JVC MiniDV Camcorder - Airport Express - iPod Nano 1gb white

Last edited by symphonix; January 26th, 2003 at 07:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 26th, 2003, 09:06 PM
AdmiralAK's Avatar
Simply Daemonic
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Classified
Posts: 5,787
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
AdmiralAK is on a distinguished road
GPRS is an intermediate technology which will lead to EDGE and eventually to 3G GSM (aka wCDMA).

With GPRS, depending on your provider you can get unlimited data plan. I know T-Mobile has a plan for $50 with unlimited data, however this is only on their Sidekick pda/phone AFAIK. -- Why settle for GRPS (i.e.e 56k wireless) when you can get an a wireless hub & DSL
__________________
<<------------------------------>>
Seid ihr bereit fuer Club Admiralty ????
Club Admiralty: Http://www.club-admiralty.com
Copyright 1996-present
Bonified Gadget Geek :-)
<<------------------------------>>
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Herve's Bar & Grill edX Bob's Place 7839 Today 08:43 AM
cell phone on the plane cfleck Bob's Place 8 August 26th, 2003 06:02 PM
Will there be interference with a 2.4Ghz wireless router and 2.4Ghz cordless phone qwikstreet Networking & Compatibility 4 May 17th, 2003 01:40 PM
RIP Apple PDA rumors, hopes... d8n_two Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 16 July 28th, 2002 11:24 PM
phone... ghz/mhz Nummi_G4 Bob's Place 31 May 31st, 2002 11:42 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.