|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Does anyone have any idea if the 128MB/1.5GB hardware requirements (just for the OS) might lessen with the 1.0 release? Maybe it's just me (and I'm pretty sure it's not), but that's a bit steep for a company who is trying to get on the good side of consumers. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| I'd expect it to stay the same. In fact, it runs much better with 256-512 M of ram and more drive space for swap files.
__________________ -d |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IBM gives vision for future Macs | ~~NeYo~~ | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 35 | October 16th, 2002 01:28 PM |
| The Positive Reaction Thread | edX | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 29 | August 15th, 2002 09:42 PM |
| my stance for macs. | solrac | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 35 | June 2nd, 2002 01:00 AM |
| Confused with system requirements for OS X | Gwailo | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 5 | May 28th, 2002 12:05 PM |