|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| NEVARH! Argghh!
__________________ - iMac G5 1.8GHZ 17" | SuperDrive | 160GB | 512MB | Airport Extreme | Bluetooth Keyboard & Mouse | Wacom Intuos II - Pentax *ist DL - JVC MiniDV Camcorder - Airport Express - iPod Nano 1gb white |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| 1. Ocelot 2. Caracal 3. Serval 4. Onza Also if you really think about, there are no official Panthers. So what is to stop Apple using other non-offical cat names?
__________________ PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8(Rev A.), , 7 Gig RAM, Pioneer DVR-110, ATI X800XT, OS X 10.4.11 & 10.5.5, 23'' HD LCD Mac Book Pro Core 2 Duo 2.16Mhz, SuperDrive, ATI X1600, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.5 1TB Time Capsule 5g iPod 30Gig White |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| Oooh, I'd love that. But I guess there are copyright issues there, as long as Apple wants to use their internal codenames as product names.
__________________ macnews.net.tc is active again. MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| Yes, I think Apple should follow Mozilla's lead and use copyrighted name after copyrighted name. ("Firefox" is at least the third name for that product, following Pheonix and Firebird.)They should make it simple and start using the names of Pokémon. "Mac OS Snorlax" has a nice ring to it, doesn't it? |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| I still like "Mac OS X 10.6". Sounds professional. Good. Nothing fluffy about it, but it works.
__________________ macnews.net.tc is active again. MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| That has its own problems. "Ten ten" does not sound clean. "Mac OS 10.6" would be swell. Heck, I'd accept "Mac OS X.VI" or even "Mac OS X 6.0". But putting the major number in there twice, as Apple has done ever since 10.0, is really annoying. I mean, it's not version 10 of Mac OS X! At least using names downplays this sloppiness. |
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
| Or why go 10.6? Go to OS XI directly. Some years ago fryke suggested Elephant as a next codename. That sounds good.. big, gray, and bloated. XI. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|