|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| fryke, I see what you mean, now the fixes are already here a 10.4.9 shouldn't too hard. On the other hand, the paranoid can patch their system (apps?) from Fuller as the bugs gets released. Lurk, exactly, with word, they can probably go on and fill up the rest of 2007!!
__________________ [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Catel - Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz, 1GB Ram, OSX Tiger.8 AMDemon - Dual Opteron 2.6Ghz, 2GB Ram, FreeBSD 6.1 |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| 10.4.9 is already in development, and I think new fixes won't make it into that build. A separate security update release would fit better.
__________________ macnews.net.tc is active again. MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Landon's fixes don't really fix anything, they just bypass the problem. It requires you use a program called Application Enhancer which allows his code to be injected into a running application like Quicktime. This code replaces the calls to the vulnerable functions with his own, does some validation to fix the flaw, and then calls the original function. Not that this isn't a work around for the flaws, but it's not exactly a fix for Apple's code.
__________________ MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet) Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM dferns@macosx.com |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| While it isn't a fix per se, it's much better than leaving your machine unpatched after the entire world has been alerted to the vulnerabilities affecting Apple machines. I suggest using Landon's fixes until Apple releases an official fix. Waiting till the end of the month before doing something about it doesn't sound safe to me ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|