|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| Thanks for the info. <off-topic> If you haven't done so yet, spend 2 hours in a theater to watch "Das Leben der Anderen", it is really worth the time. </off-topic>
__________________ My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" with MacOS X 10.5. My Apples are here. My oldest Apple was born in 1977. GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+ PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y? Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Looks good. /back to topic I really, really want an update to our GUI. Also, AFAIK, there haven't been many changes in developer builds to the Finder... isn't it inexorability that the Finder gets some major updates? I'd be damned if all the hype Jobs created with his "hidden features" was *more* applications.
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| yeah i think the last thing the mac community wants is more bloated apps. we want something tangible that says something to the Vista fanboys obsessed with their newfound graphical ability.
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| I have _that_ already. Whenever someone's just used Vista, let them move a few icons around a Tiger desktop, and they'll notice how everything feels more solid, working etc. Vista feels "dreamy, hazy" kinda, and most of the time you really _want_ to do smething, the screen darkens like a kernel panic and asks you whether you're human and really want to complete the task.
__________________ macnews.net.tc is active again. MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| This may be a stupid question, but as an owner of a G4 ibook, will leopard run on it or will I need to get an intel machine? |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| Leopard should run on it, but the G4 would probably be considered as the bottom of the barrel for support. I could be wrong. We won't know for sure though until it's actually released.
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04 |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| i would be surprised if G3 iBooks couldn't officially run it. Tiger runs absolutely flawlessly on my 700mhz G3. and i mean, seamlessly fast. Leopard is just another extension of the same OS...
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#16
| ||||
| ||||
| Yes, but Apple quite clearly simply defines a cut-off date for supported machines. They _could_ say that the G3 processor simply isn't supported any longer. Most of the flashy new graphics features wouldn't run on the machines, anyway - and new apps should theoretically be compatible with 10.3.9-10.5.x unless they specifically require things like CoreAnimation etc. We'll see when Apple posts the requirements officially on apple.com ... ![]()
__________________ macnews.net.tc is active again. MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|