|
#1
May 18th, 2007, 06:42 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Mac OS X 10.4.10 in development There's not that much information yet, but I guess the main thing for most on forums like this one will be the numbering scheme.  ... There are articles on MacRumors, AppleInsider and macnews.net.tc - and today, ThinkSecret has also weighed in on it: http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0705macosx10410.html ...I for one am glad that Apple's doing this. 
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2.1), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2.1) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.  |
|
#2
May 18th, 2007, 07:51 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Cool! Will this be an alternative to buying Leopard?
__________________ Mac OS X Leopard 10.5.5 iMac (glass) Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2Ghz 1GB RAM ATI Radeon X1600 (128MB) |
|
#3
May 18th, 2007, 07:57 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| And here we thought this wouldn't materialize... 
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04 |
|
#4
May 19th, 2007, 05:21 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2.1), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2.1) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. |
|
#5
May 19th, 2007, 07:41 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| I usally wait till they release 10.x.1 of anything because, it always seems that theres a small bug that kills me.
__________________ MacBook 2.0 GHz , 120 GB, 2 GB, OS 10.5.5 (someone stepped on my MacBook and crushed my less than a year old 250 GB HD:[.) PowerMac G5 Dual 2.3 GHz, 750 GB, 1 GB, OS 10.5.5 Server |
|
#6
May 19th, 2007, 07:51 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| I'm going to stick to Tiger at the moment and first check if my router, HP all-in-one printer etc... accept Leopard. And if I'm really going to update, then only my MacBook because my iBook is already quite slow, and with Leopard... I don't even want to imagine.
__________________ MacBook / 2 GHz / 1.5 GB RAM / 100 GB HD / Mac OS X.5.4 iBook G4 / 1 GHz / 768 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / Mac OS X.5.4 iMac G4 / 700 MHz / 768 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / Mac OS X.4.11 iMac G3 / 266 MHz / 320 MB RAM / 6 GB HD / Mac OS 9.2.2 |
|
#7
May 19th, 2007, 03:45 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| For many years since 6.04 to 10.4.9. Never see .10 now, Therefore apple's first time to have 10.4.x its very strange to see this.
__________________ Mac Pro 8-Core 3 Ghz, 4GB and 1 TB (Video Editing) Mac Pro Quad 2.5 Ghz, 4GB and 1 TB (Graphic) iMac 24" Core 2 Duo 2.33 ghz 2 GB and 500GB (Work) MacBook Pro 15" LED 2.4ghz 2 GB iPhone 8GB |
|
#8
May 19th, 2007, 04:38 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Back in the days of classic Mac OS, you _wouldn't_ have seen it. They would've gone from, say, 6.08 to 6.1, treating these numbers as decimals.
__________________ MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2.1), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2.1) Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. |
