|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Larger capacity iPod touch/iPhone Larger capacity iPhones and iPod touches have just been released: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008...ipodtouch.html Quote:
|
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I find this very surprising. With 3rd party apps coming at the end of this month, and the strong possibility of a 3G iPhone announcement soon, there is bound to be a 'special event' keynote within the next few weeks. Everyone (myself included) thought that seeing as they didn't announce 16GB iPhones at MacWorld, that meant they were saving it for an all-iPhone keynote to mark the launch of 3rd party apps. With this news, do people still think there will be a keynote for 3rd party app announcement? also, 32GB SSD. yikes, that's pretty impressive! I presume this would thicken the touch somewhat though. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
![]() It looks like they've done the impossible, actually. It's a little salty, though; I'd rather have a 16GB iPhone.
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| I'd expect that greater solid state storage would not necessarily increase the thickness, depending on how it was done. If the choice was two 8 GB chips or two 16 GB chips, I'd expect thicknesses to be the same or similar. If additional chips had to be included, that might be another matter. Qion: I don't quite follow, what do you mean that it looks a bit "salty?" If you mean the appearance, I actually preference the subtler appearance of the iPod touch over the iPhone, but it's a matter opinion. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
EDIT: Just checked on Google, evidently the term comes from a rough Polish translation. ![]()
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone Last edited by Qion; February 6th, 2008 at 08:19 AM. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Oh, OK. Thanks, I learn something new everyday. ![]() In the UK, I guess the equivalent would be "dear," although I also hear usage of "minty." Reminds me of an awful joke... "I paid £20 for a haunch of venison. Was that deer?" *Ahem* ![]() |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| I don't think there's going to be a 3G version of the iPhone quite yet. They wouldn't come out with this now only to release the 3G in a few months. I think if anything it'll be the end of the year 2008. 3G still seems to be a little too power hungry for most people's tastes.
__________________ MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet) Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM dferns@macosx.com |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| I don't really understand the obsession with 3G anyway. The amount of time I spend in public in places that don't have Wi-Fi is incredibly minimal, and my area isn't exactly Hondo City. With Wi-Fi coverage getting better and better, what's the point in forcing the standard into existence? I rarely get the urge to download a full-length movie in 1080p whilst eating at a fancy restaurant in the middle of nowhere.
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|