|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Wwdc 2008
I thought I would kick off the WWDC 2008 thread. I came across Flickr WWDC 2008 banner pictures. To me the pictures hint of a 10.6 preview and the iPhone software release.
__________________ Mac Pro Dual 2.8 Quad (1st gen), 14G Ram, Two DVD-RW Drives, OS X 10.6.2 Mac Book Pro Core 2 Duo 2.16Ghz, SuperDrive, ATI X1600, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.6.2 2TB Time Capsule 32G iPhone 3GS Black |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
There was also speculation by MacRumors that the lack of "Mac" in the banners might mean some sort of announcement for OS X on standard PCs. I guess we'll have to wait and see if that has any merit to it. Thank goodness school's out for the summer. Things should be quiet enough at work for me to keep track of the news bits during the keynote.
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10 • Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04 Last edited by nixgeek; June 7th, 2008 at 11:50 AM. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
|
Would be cool to have it running on regular PCs.
|
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
|
Expect a revolt if that happens. They took the Mac out IMO because OS X is the basis for 3 distinct products. Mac OS X, iPhone OS X, Apple TV OS X.
__________________ MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet) Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM dferns@macosx.com |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
I'll be one of the revolters if they let OS X run on regular PCs. It's against the business concept they've been trumpeting for the past millennia. It's interesting how little concrete evidence there is about the products of this event. 3G iPhone, that's a given... but does anybody want to speculate on what else?
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.0GHz Dual PowerMac G5 • 466MHz Powerbook G4 • Mac Classic |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
Consider that a move to x86 was also thought of as being "against business practice", and yet here we are with x86 Macs. At this point, I can't really put anything past Apple. I doubt it will happen, but again we never expected a full move to Intel either.
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10 • Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04 |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| That's exactly why I wouldn't be surprised by a switch to allowing regular PCs to run OS X. I've learnt to never discount anything when it comes to Apple.
|
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
|
Maybe it's just me, but it seems changing the processors in your computers is a lot less radical than changing your entire machine/software philosophy. Mac OS X didn't change because of the Intel transition; it merely became faster. Leasing OS X to PC vendors puts an entirely new face on Apple.
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.0GHz Dual PowerMac G5 • 466MHz Powerbook G4 • Mac Classic |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|