image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #9  
Old December 26th, 2008, 10:18 AM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 8,378
Thanks: 29
Thanked 142 Times in 126 Posts
nixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElDiabloConCaca View Post
Yick! Then we'd still be stuck in the days of the PowerMac 8600, 8650, 9600, 9650, 7100, 7200, 7500, 7600, and the Performa 650... aaaaaah! Noooo! Get away, Gil Amelio!
Hey now! Those were great systems in their day (although I've never seen a Performa 650 ). I remember drooling over the 7xxx/8xxx/9xxx models back in the day. Heck, I still covet them today! (Just don't tell that to my li'l ol' Quadra 650....she's the jealous type. )
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10
Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old December 26th, 2008, 10:38 AM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 12,671
Thanks: 7
Thanked 388 Times in 370 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of light
No doubt they were great machines -- I've got a 7600 here with a 300MHz G3 upgrade card and almost a gig of RAM that's still a workhorse to this day.

...but the model numbering scheme had to go. The model lineup was diluted. There was hardly a distinction between a consumer model and a pro model.
__________________
Mac mini 2.0GHz 10.6.2 • 4GB • 320GB • Superdrive • 4 x 1TB USB 2.0 • LED Cinema Display
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.6.2 • 4GB • 250GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPhone 3G 8GB • iPod Touch 8GB • iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T U-Verse 18Mb/2Mb
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old December 26th, 2008, 11:00 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,074
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
Really? I thought "Performa" and "PowerMacintosh" did that quite well. Of course, that was only true in continental Europe, because in the US, for example, a Performa 6300 could also be called PowerMacintosh 6300, probably to sell it better. Either way, I clearly meant the OS and just the OS. I'm glad my iMac is not called "iMac 5300" or something like that. Although "iMac (mid 2007)" doesn't really make for good-feel differentation-name imho either.

The OS numbers, however, still have the longstanding question what will happen in 2010/2011, though. Not because "11 comes after 10.9", of course. Since 10.4.11 Apple has cleared that one up. But when introducing OS X, Steve liked to call it the OS for the next decade, and that was around 2000/2001. I don't see Apple abandoning the OS base anytime soon, but maybe we'll actually _get_ a Mac OS 11 one day..?
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old December 26th, 2008, 11:28 AM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 12,671
Thanks: 7
Thanked 388 Times in 370 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke View Post
I'm glad my iMac is not called "iMac 5300" or something like that. Although "iMac (mid 2007)" doesn't really make for good-feel differentation-name imho either.
I think maybe it's the same thinking behind card modeling names and numbers... for example, there are a ton of BMW 325i cars over the last few decades, only differentiated by their model year (i.e., BMW 325i, 2006 model). Someone saying "I've got a Volkswagen Jetta" doesn't tell you much -- they could have a 1988 model, or a 2008 model -- BIG difference!
__________________
Mac mini 2.0GHz 10.6.2 • 4GB • 320GB • Superdrive • 4 x 1TB USB 2.0 • LED Cinema Display
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.6.2 • 4GB • 250GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPhone 3G 8GB • iPod Touch 8GB • iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T U-Verse 18Mb/2Mb
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old December 26th, 2008, 11:55 AM
Mikuro's Avatar
Crotchety UI Nitpicker
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,682
Thanks: 6
Thanked 53 Times in 48 Posts
Mikuro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke View Post
The OS numbers, however, still have the longstanding question what will happen in 2010/2011, though. Not because "11 comes after 10.9", of course. Since 10.4.11 Apple has cleared that one up.
__________________
Mac mini — 1.25GHz G4, 1GB RAM — OS 10.5.8

Useful programs: Privoxy, Butler, ffmpegX, VLC, Perian, Tofu, Wcalc
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old December 26th, 2008, 01:07 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,074
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
lol (btw.: I just noticed that I kinda missed on 10.4.10 being the version clearing it up...)
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.