image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old December 28th, 2008, 05:42 AM
Rhisiart's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Procrastinateville
Posts: 2,101
Thanks: 42
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rhisiart has a spectacular aura aboutRhisiart has a spectacular aura about
How will Snow Leopard compare with Windows 7?

Comparing apples and oranges?
__________________
Intel Mac Mini 1.83 1GB 10.6.1
PowerMac G4 833Hz 768MB 10.3.9

Truth can influence only a few, while falsehood and mystery will drag millions by the nose.
Aristotle
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 28th, 2008, 05:51 AM
krassyo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rousse, Bulgaria
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
krassyo is on a distinguished road
Well I seem to miss the Snow Leopard part and see no comparison at all on this page
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 28th, 2008, 05:53 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 13
Thanked 89 Times in 84 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
In my totally unprofessional opinion, Windows 7 will be much better than Vista ever was for Microsoft. But then there's a *lot* of hope there, and the expectations might not get met once the final product arrives. Similar things happened for XP and Vista when they were first released.

Snow Leopard is not looking like it'll be a "wow!" release. It doesn't seem to be about UI features and stuff, rather about cleaning up the act, getting rid of PowerPC etc. It also looks like graphics cards will get a much bigger role in 10.6. I'm looking forward to that.

I don't think it'll be much of a "brainer". Windows might find its grip again, but by its release, Apple will have continued to eat into the market pie. And I don't see that momentum fade anytime soon. Let's see whether Apple's new products at MWSF will be products that can bring more people over to our side of the pond. A new Mac mini might almost certainly help that cause. It's been denied of that role lately by not having been updated.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 28th, 2008, 06:08 AM
Rhisiart's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Procrastinateville
Posts: 2,101
Thanks: 42
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rhisiart has a spectacular aura aboutRhisiart has a spectacular aura about
I'd be pleased to see the Mac Mini updated. However I would recommend that potential Mac Mini purchasers go for maximum memory and hard disc capacity at time of purchase.

Having looked at the beta snapshots of Windows 7 I am disappointed to see the perennial (and very irritating) Windows pop-ups are still a feature.
__________________
Intel Mac Mini 1.83 1GB 10.6.1
PowerMac G4 833Hz 768MB 10.3.9

Truth can influence only a few, while falsehood and mystery will drag millions by the nose.
Aristotle
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 28th, 2008, 09:38 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 13
Thanked 89 Times in 84 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
About that Mac mini comment: Here's to the hope that the Mac mini gets a clue from the unibody MacBooks and lets users install RAM and harddrive themselves easily. Yeah, it hasn't been Apple's thing in the past, but the MacBook and MBP shows that they can and currently are willing to do it. But that's off-topic.

About the Win7 thing: I don't think MS will walk off their long-trodden paths too much. The same things that have been irritating us in the past will continue to do so in the future. In other ways, maybe. Remember how Windows XP suddenly got that ugly Fisher-Price look? It was toy-like at best. Today it's called the more professional alternative, because Vista has taken its cues from 3D games instead of a user interface handbook. I'm not entirely sure Microsoft gets that at all, but from what I've seen about Win7 by now, I just don't think so.

I mean: Take a look at image 23 of that gallery... Don't they see how that upper lip is plain ugly? I don't see any way to see this any differently.

Or this one... They seem to have quite an issue with space. It doesn't look right. At all.

Much worse, though: It's not gonna feel right. Microsoft hasn't tried to get the "feel" part of "look & feel" right. They've played with effects of menus fading etc. and they've been playing with transparency effects lately, but they just haven't actually looked at GUIs that _do_ feel right. I fully expect them to release some kind of new mouse next year with force-feedback to add effects to handling Windows 7. It'll feel even more like a computer game, and that might attract the game folks, actually, but they won't get it right. History proves it. They just don't get these things.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 28th, 2008, 11:01 AM
Rhisiart's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Procrastinateville
Posts: 2,101
Thanks: 42
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Rhisiart has a spectacular aura aboutRhisiart has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke View Post
I don't think MS will walk off their long-trodden paths too much ....
There lies the rub.
__________________
Intel Mac Mini 1.83 1GB 10.6.1
PowerMac G4 833Hz 768MB 10.3.9

Truth can influence only a few, while falsehood and mystery will drag millions by the nose.
Aristotle
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 28th, 2008, 12:11 PM
Mikuro's Avatar
Crotchety UI Nitpicker
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,679
Thanks: 6
Thanked 50 Times in 46 Posts
Mikuro will become famous soon enough
I'll believe it when I see it. I remember people asking how Longhorn would compare to Jaguar, then Panther, then Tiger, and finally Leopard (although they did beat Leopard to market by almost a year). I realize Microsoft is trying to learn from their mistakes, but I'll still be surprised if Windows 7 is released in 2009. You know the old saying from Texas: "Fool me once...shame on........shame on you........................fool me can't get fooled again."

In any case, I'm sure that Windows will still be Windows. I can't use an XP machine for 5 minutes without Windows doing something annoying. Oh, there are unused icons on my desktop, you say? Not interested. Oh, there are unused icons on my desktop, you say? No, still not interested. Oh, there are....FINE! DO WHATEVER YOU WANT! JUST STOP BOTHERING ME!
__________________
Mac mini — 1.25GHz G4, 1GB RAM — OS 10.5.8

Useful programs: Privoxy, Butler, ffmpegX, VLC, Perian, Tofu, Wcalc
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old December 28th, 2008, 12:45 PM
chevy's Avatar
Leopardo Da Vinci
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the black box, CH
Posts: 3,967
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
chevy is on a distinguished road
I believe that 7 will be a shrunk down version of Vista, less fancy but much more efficient and completely recompiled to use the most recent hardware.

And 7 may include all little apps that are currently of Live so that you can you your files locally or remotely.
__________________
My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" and a MacBook Pro 13" with MacOS X 10.6. My oldest Apple was born in 1977.
GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+ PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y?
Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.