image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #9  
Old October 20th, 2009, 04:43 PM
chevy's Avatar
Leopardo Da Vinci
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the black box, CH
Posts: 3,967
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
chevy is on a distinguished road
HT was very important on Pentiums. It is what made Windows responsive on P4 machines. It is what made anti-viruses acceptable.

Now, what does it mean when we have 4 CPUs available ?
__________________
My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" and a MacBook Pro 13" with MacOS X 10.6. My oldest Apple was born in 1977.
GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+ PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y?
Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old October 20th, 2009, 04:55 PM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 12,672
Thanks: 7
Thanked 388 Times in 370 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy View Post
HT was very important on Pentiums. It is what made Windows responsive on P4 machines. It is what made anti-viruses acceptable.
I kind of don't know what you're trying to say here. Yes, Pentium 4 processors had HyperThreading -- they also had extremely long pipelines (something on the order of 21 stages, while comparable G4 processors had around half that, or less), and the HyperThreading was almost required to make up for this problem -- some would even argue that it compounded the problem.

I don't know what you're trying to say when you say, "It is what made anti-viruses acceptable." Anti-virus protection and HyperThreading have nothing to do with each other at all.

Quote:
Now, what does it mean when we have 4 CPUs available ?
What do you mean, "what does it mean?" It means that the 4 cores will appear as 8 to the system. It means that you can theoretically have 8 concurrently executing threads. What else do you want it to mean? Can you elaborate on your question a tad?
__________________
Mac mini 2.0GHz 10.6.2 • 4GB • 320GB • Superdrive • 4 x 1TB USB 2.0 • LED Cinema Display
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.6.2 • 4GB • 250GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPhone 3G 8GB • iPod Touch 8GB • iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T U-Verse 18Mb/2Mb
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old October 20th, 2009, 05:37 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,074
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
Basically, I'd stay it's a very strong iMac line-up. _All_ of the "cheaper" machines run at 3.06 or 3.33 GHz and the core i5 and i7 processors surely make those machines well-built graphics powerhouses. (Although I'd still like an inexpensive Mac Pro rather than those more expensive iMacs to fill the gap between the iMac and the Mac Pro, but that simply won't happen, it seems.)

The beautiful thing about the core i7 (which I'll choose) is that it does adapt to power requirements so nicely. It can run at very high clock speed when powering down 3 of the 4 cores, so a single task can have the power it requires - or it can run at still-very-much-decent speed on all 4 cores. It's a nice processor, design-wise. At least it seems like that to me on paper. I'll love to put it through tests.

On the other end: The white MacBook suddenly looks sweet again. Those flakey topcases (breaking plastic around the keyboard) was getting old. Now it looks like a good machine again, and inexpensive enough, too.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old October 20th, 2009, 09:47 PM
#1 Rhapsody's Avatar
Mac Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 326
Thanks: 5
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
#1 Rhapsody is on a distinguished road
I wish the new mouse would work with Windows. If you are running Boot Camp and got a new mouse, how are you supposed to use it???

I wish it would work with Tiger as well.
__________________
RhapsodyOS.tk Rhapsody OS Support/Development Site
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.