image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #9  
Old April 27th, 2001, 07:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CJNE is on a distinguished road
Switched from OS X to LinuxPPC 2000

I started out buying a cube because i thought os x looked so cool. It was kinda cool at first but i soon got annoyed by small things like:
* it's horribly slow
* netinfo/hosts isn't working with bsd apps
* almost no usable native apps
* no virtual desktops (space.app lacks too much in that area to be usable)
* Xdarwin is incredibly slow and does not support international keyboards

and so on

So without a usable X server on it i couldn't even run Xemacs, one of the things that i must have (virtual desktops is the other must).

So i ended up installing LinuxPPC on another partition.
It was FAST!! in comparsion with os x.
XFree86 v 4 is also FAST.
And everything just worked (compiling all good opensource stuff out there etc), this was like heaven.

Add to that MacOnLinux which works pretty much like classic and Ximian GNOME 1.4 (GNOME by the way does not suck, especially this dist is very nice) and you have something that's in my opinion is far better than os x in it's current state.

The conclusion is that if you, like me, wanted os x mainly because of the unix subsytem combined with nice gui, go for linux instead until os x gets it right.
Once os x is usable i'll prbably switch back, i still think that the idea is good

When it comes to performance as a webserver, it's just a waste of money considering you can get a much cheaper intel-linux machine that probably works much better to.

Well, i guess i'm done now
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old April 28th, 2001, 02:04 AM
strobe's Avatar
Puny Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
strobe is on a distinguished road
The reason why LinuxPPC's XFree86 is faster is because it's accelerated. XDarwin isn't, and can't be because DRI is incompatible with the video card driver architecture OS X uses. X11 sucks anyway.

Virtual screens suck ass. You should have bought a dual G4 and several cheap video cards instead.

If you want something expecting ancient /etc/ files like passwd then use nidump and niload, yeesh.

GNOME does indeed suck. Only the lowered expectations of the Linux experience could elevate it to non-sucktitude
__________________
---
>80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
>life
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old April 28th, 2001, 04:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ginoledesma is on a distinguished road
Oh yes, one note I forgot to include, I prefer xfce over the bloated GNOME/KDE.

One good way to test speed would be Apache, I guess, but I can't install that right now since I have to do stuff on Mac OS 9.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I killed my OSX with Linux... can't reinstall HELP! Lazarus18 Mac OS X System & Mac Software 2 March 19th, 2002 06:10 AM
LINUX and The Mac (Pinky and the Brain?) xphile Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 4 September 5th, 2001 12:28 AM
What makes Linux better/differnt than OS X? iPenguin Bob's Place 2 August 1st, 2001 03:51 AM
OSX, or linux or BSD tuco Mac OS X System & Mac Software 8 February 10th, 2001 12:26 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.