|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
|
Alright, now that apple has come out with the AAC format i have converted all my MP3's. i am wondering if 20-30% (amount reduced by on avrage) is enough to convince you to swich to the AAC format. are you willing to let iTunes be your only MP3 player (for now) or is converting your songs worth it? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| to convert, or not???
Jet I commend you on your stoicism! You've re-ripped all your MP3s??? I've now got 3,522 in my iTunes folder, and it's taken me quite a while to build that up (I get bored easily!) To consider re-ripping them would necessitate much more than the Heineken that's sitting in front of me now! That's not to say I don't consider the 20-30% saving in space a bonus - I just need to find someone who can do my "donkey work"! You state "In Mac We Trust" (and, as an "applewhore", I wholeheartedly concur!) but I just can't conceive of going through the whole process again... not just yet, anyway!
__________________ 17" 2.16 ghz mbp / 2 gb ram / os x 10.4.6 dual 2.5 ghz g5 pm / 6.5 gb ram / os x 10.4.6 dual 1 ghz pm / 2 gb ram / os x 10.3.5 apple 23" displays... plus bits'n'pieces... |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
You can use iTunes to convert the mp3 file to AAC format. No need to re-rip the cd. After to convert the song then you need to delete the mp3.
__________________ Michael http://www.OSBLUE.com |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
![]() remember, when converting with "lossy" codecs twice, you'll also get twice the quality loss. so when you convert a 192 kbps MP3 to 148 kbps AAC you'll get a file that equals a 96 kbps MP3. very ineffective, as the size is only 30% smaller.
__________________ leo at code.coop Co-operatives are private corporations based on the values of self-help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity and solidarity. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
|
if your not a big stickler about pristine audio quality - using itunes to convert is the best way to go, although it does take quite a while. i took that road rather then re rip everything (i was running out of hd space ) and i haven't noticed a loss between 192 mp3 and 128 aac. i haven't pumped anything through a hi fi stereo, but the speakers on my imac and my sony wraparound's haven't seemed to change the sound quality too much. even when both itunes and system volume are set to 100% (i normally have them at around 30 %) i don't notice anything - no beeps or crackles or skips.
__________________ iMac G3 600Mhz, 256MB RAM, 40GB HD, 10.3.5 20GB iPod (Click Wheel) w/ Griffin iTrip // AIM:kjell05 |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
|
Hmm... As you'll still get lower quality - and sometimes VERY audibly so - I suggest that you leave your current MP3s as they are and just import new songs as AAC. The 20-30%, well, so be it...
__________________ iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1 MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1 Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1 MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7 iPhone 3GS 32 GB white. Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1) |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
|
Can you go back to MP3 later ?
__________________ My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" and a MacBook Pro 13" with MacOS X 10.6. My oldest Apple was born in 1977. GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+ PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y? Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
Of course, but you'll lose quality AGAIN so no point in doing that :s
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| iTunes, the perfect interface for music services? | Matrix Agent | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 6 | June 20th, 2003 12:28 PM |
| iPod-argh: Where is my music??? 10 G in use, 8 G free, 410 MB (I had 13,5G) music??!! | Giaguara | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 9 | March 10th, 2003 10:20 AM |