Possible? Yes, technically it fulfils the requirements and is a "supported" machine. However, as I don't own one, I cannot attest to it's usability.... anybody with a beige G3?.... Beuller?.... Beuller?
A friend gave me a beige G3 (233/512k cache/192mb RAM/4gb/24x CD) today, running OS 9.2.2. I was wondering if it's possible to run OS X on (doesn't need to be fast, it's just something for my computer illiterate mom (she usually uses our g4's, but wants something in her room to write letters on, and occasionally surf the web...and anything's better than the old Pentium 133 with 16 megs of RAM that's been gathering dust in there. All the apps that we own are OS X, and I'd like to throw Office, Safari, and iTunes on there for here. Possible?
17" iMac LCD 1ghz/80/Superdrive
Harman/Kardon Soundsticks
El Gato EyeTV
15 Gb iPod
Possible? Yes, technically it fulfils the requirements and is a "supported" machine. However, as I don't own one, I cannot attest to it's usability.... anybody with a beige G3?.... Beuller?.... Beuller?
-Adam S ... PowerBook G4 (Mac OS X... the latest version, whatever it is, I've got it, dangit) and original iPod (iLove music, therefore iLove iPod)
<shamelessplug>http://www.geocities.com/adambyte</shamelessplug>
Actually, I just installed Jaguar, and it's VERY snappy. I intend to use it as a UNIX box. In Aqua, it actually feels quite a bit faster than my iMac g4 with 256 megs of RAM. I've heard something on here about how Aqua slows down over time, and if you make a new user account, and switch all your settings over, it feels like you're flying, the speed difference is so great. Anyone know anything about this?
17" iMac LCD 1ghz/80/Superdrive
Harman/Kardon Soundsticks
El Gato EyeTV
15 Gb iPod
That can't be right...
Mac Pro Xeon 4x2.66 GHz | OS X 10.4.7, WinXP | 3 GB RAM | 250 GB HD | 250 GB HD | 300 GB HD
MacBook Core Duo 2.0 GHz | OS X 10.4.7 | 1 GB RAM | 80 GB HD
Mac mini Core Solo 1.5 GHz | OS X 10.4.7 and Windows XP SP2 | 512 MB RAM | 60 GB HD | 400 GB HD
Pentium 4 3.06 GHz | Windows XP SP2 and OS X 10.4.3 | 1.5 GB RAM | 100 and 120 GB HD
I've installed OS X in old Macs but them being faster than G4 Macs? No way!![]()
Except if your G4 OS X config is messed up or something...
Then I read closer your 1st reply where you were saying that is for your mom which of course for the things you mentioned more than enough![]()
![]()
I find your lack of faith... Disturbing!
Windows is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical shell for an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition
...not the sharpest knife in the drawer...
I couldn't believe it either....but window response is snappier. I click an icon in the dock, it bounces once or twice, and opens. Do the same thing on my iMac, and it bounces 5-6x. Windows take a second of lag time to close on the G4, but almost instantaneously on the beige G3. Guys, what gives?! Oh, the monitor makes a high-pitched noise, so my mom decided she'll keep the PeeCee, and I'm using the G3 strictly as a UNIX box.
17" iMac LCD 1ghz/80/Superdrive
Harman/Kardon Soundsticks
El Gato EyeTV
15 Gb iPod
Why not use the PC monitor with the G3?
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
not sure, cause I don't have one, but I used to work on a biege g3 233 and it had internal scsi. (I'm not sure if that is standard or the bureau had upgraded to the scsi hd) Faster drive - faster start-up
Bookmarks