image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old December 16th, 2003, 12:05 AM
Randman's Avatar
HA! HA! HA!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,999
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Randman is on a distinguished road
Apple maintains lead with iTMS

http://www.technewsworld.com/perl/story/32389.html
__________________
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 16th, 2003, 04:53 AM
pds's Avatar
pds pds is offline
conf User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On the edge.
Posts: 2,158
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
pds is on a distinguished road
At the risk of sounding like a broken record, I agree that something has to happen to make sure that AAC and mp4 stays ahead of the pack and unfortunately Apple's advertising campaign can't do it alone.

While they don't have to open the portable market, they should license the technology of iTunes (i.e. allow non-portable manufacturers to build boom boxes and other stereo equipment that is compatible with iTunes play lists and auto syncs with your iPod) to create a bigger market for the codec.

Can you imagine a Bang and Olufsen dock for the iPod or a Panasonic CD, Cassette, HD machine with detachable speakers that uses iTunes in a cd control window?

Is it too late to call AACs what they are, MP4's? The majority of music consumers are technophobes and they barely understand mp3's. Using mp4 seems like a winner to me, people will automatically assume they are better (as they are).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 16th, 2003, 05:47 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,322
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
AACs are not MP4s. So it's not too late to call them that, it's wrong. ;-) Well, MP3s are really MPEG-1 Layer 3 's, so maybe that argument is wrong, too...

No, I don't see Apple licensing "iTunes" that way. Wouldn't be easy, anyway. You'd need a Pentium III or G3 processor in that B&O stereo. ;-)

But I agree that Apple must do something to propagate MPEG-4, AAC and their AAC-DRM. I'm sure they have a plan. They don't _want_ to lose, do they?
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 16th, 2003, 07:04 AM
pds's Avatar
pds pds is offline
conf User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On the edge.
Posts: 2,158
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
pds is on a distinguished road
Just up on the Apple site,

25 million songs sold

The iPod doesn't have a cpu, so why would the B&O stereo?

Last edited by pds; December 16th, 2003 at 07:07 AM. Reason: add a question
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 16th, 2003, 09:50 AM
monktus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: County Armagh, Ireland
Posts: 610
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
monktus is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pds
Just up on the Apple site,

25 million songs sold

The iPod doesn't have a cpu, so why would the B&O stereo?
IIRC it does, just not a very powerful one. You can (almost) run linux on it after all!

But, anyway, yay Apple. Noticed two Apple related stories on the front page of BBC News today.
__________________
MacBook Core 2 Duo 2.1
PowerMac G4 800
"...And The Dogcow Went Moof".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.