image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #57  
Old January 5th, 2004, 02:52 PM
Cat's Avatar
Cat Cat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: @ my Mac
Posts: 1,972
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cat is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Flash iPods would be sweet
Flash iPods would be expensive: much more expensive in fact than HD-based ones ...
__________________
This is not a signature (but I could be wrong).
15" MacBook Pro C2D@2.4 GHz | 2 GB RAM | Mac OS 10.5.4 |
Website | LinkedIn | Publications
GP/O d-(+)@ s: a->? C++(+++) U* P+ L+>++ !E---- W+++ N o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+++ PE-- Y+ PGP t 5? X- R !tv b++++ DI+(++)@ D+(++) G++(+++) e+++$>++++$$ h--->---- r+++ y++++@
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old January 5th, 2004, 07:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
daedbird is on a distinguished road
sounds sweet

sounds pretty sweet
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old January 5th, 2004, 08:06 PM
Planet Brooklyn!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
breuklen is on a distinguished road
Cat already said it, Flash is too expensive. And there are 2" HDs out there. So I believe the miniature iPod will materialize.

So will iOffice (updated, improved AppleWorks) and of course, speed bumps for most lines. Let's hope the eMac dies too.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old January 5th, 2004, 08:08 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,322
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
1". 2" would be bigger than the currently used 1.8" HDs. ;-)

The eMac dies? I hope not, that's a sweet entry-level computer. _If_ it should die, let's hope it's replaced by something even more affordable. Like... A headless eMac and a cheap display to go with it. But I'm not _that_ interested in consumer Mac news.
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old January 5th, 2004, 08:15 PM
Planet Brooklyn!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
breuklen is on a distinguished road
Read on another site (or was told? can't remember now) that the 2" HD would be housed in a new case, making the mini-iPod smaller with less capacity.

The eMac is ugly and appears outdated compared to the FP iMac line. There probably won't be a new consumer Mac announcement at MWSF. But since I want to get one for my nieces, I can hope.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old January 5th, 2004, 08:31 PM
Arden's Avatar
Don't drink and derive.
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 7,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Arden is on a distinguished road
Why is everyone hating the eMac? It's a great computer, and it looks better than the original iMac. It even performed a little better than the G4 iMac in Macworld's reviews.
__________________
System:
2.5 GHz MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM, 200 GB hard drive, runs 10.5.4
1.6 GHz iMac G5, 1.5 GB RAM, 250 GB hard drive, runs 10.4.11
iPhone, 4 GB, OS X 2.0.2
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old January 5th, 2004, 08:42 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,322
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
Well, I guess that's a matter of taste, Arden, and sadly you don't have any. ;-) (j/k) ... I'd say the eMac is "nice enough" for an affordable Mac, but not really for an Apple product. I'd rather see Apple make an iMac with an even smaller screen (i.e. getting rid of the CRT in the eMac). A really compact one. Look at the space an iBook needs, then translate that in a really compact new eMac.
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old January 5th, 2004, 10:01 PM
Ripcord's Avatar
Senior Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bahston, MA
Posts: 1,151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ripcord is on a distinguished road
I like the eMac, I'd just really love to see it at about $600. It'd be easier to convince a whole series of people I know to upgrade then...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.