Somehow the use of the word "superior" without some substantiation makes me doubt the credibility of this writer as a journalist and a source.Originally Posted by adambyte
Got this link from a story on Slashdot. Could it seriously be true? Isn't this going to kill the AAC format?
http://www.connectedhomemag.com/Audi...rticleID=41429
-Adam S ... PowerBook G4 (Mac OS X... the latest version, whatever it is, I've got it, dangit) and original iPod (iLove music, therefore iLove iPod)
<shamelessplug>http://www.geocities.com/adambyte</shamelessplug>
Somehow the use of the word "superior" without some substantiation makes me doubt the credibility of this writer as a journalist and a source.Originally Posted by adambyte
- iMac G5 1.8GHZ 17" | SuperDrive | 160GB | 512MB | Airport Extreme | Bluetooth Keyboard & Mouse | Wacom Intuos II
- Pentax *ist DL - JVC MiniDV Camcorder - Airport Express - iPod Nano 1gb white
I'm sure WMA has to have some presence on iPods being a Windoze format. But WMA doesn't work with iTunes, even WinTunes, so once peecee users have a chance to experiment with aac content, do you seriously think they'll stick with WMA? If anything, it'll give more people a hands-on demo on the demos/strengths of both formats. But the iTMS and iTunes should give aac the winning edge.
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
The hpPod has been discussed on this board for about 5 or so days now... however, I highly doubt Apple will allow HP to add WMA support for the very reason you wondered about it. Why not just support it in the first place? Because it sucks and it's proprietary. Why should HP add it, anyway? The iTMS isn't going to start selling WMA's along with/instead of AAC's anytime during Steve Jobs's lifetime.
Systems:
• 2.5 GHz MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB hard drive, runs 10.6.8
• 1.6 GHz iMac G5, 1.5 GB RAM, 120 GB hard drive, runs 10.4.11 (out of commission)
• iPhone 4, 16 GB, iOS 4.3.5
From Macrumors Page 2:
'In November, when asked about supporting WMA, Steve Jobs said "We decided to support an open audio codec standard [AAC] rather than a proprietary one." .... "That's our plan and we're sticking to it. We're feeling real good about it too". '
I don't think Apple will support WMA. If HP backs this, and perhaps several other vendors (including REAL), then Apple will have the dominant DRM used for digital music, thus iPod being the best option for the digital realm.
iMac G5 with iSight; 20"; 1.5GB RAM
MacBook Pro 15"
iPod Nano 1GB
3rd Generation 20gb iPod
Just because M$ says it's better doesn't make it so. They say that about Windoze but we(except the trolls) know that isn't true.
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Also, the "You've heard it here first!" comment further reduces credibility of the 'article'. HP's made it clear that it'll use iTMS as the store for the hPods. Thus, WMA ain't needed.
Mac user since 1987. Running Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion on a MacBook Air 11" & an iMac 27" and whatever's newest for my iPhone 4s, iPad 3 and AppleTV 2.
Apple Certified System Administrator 10.6, Apple Sales Professional 2008-2011, Apple Certified Mac Technician.
This guy is stuck up his own rear. If you try communicating with him via email, he'll just give you some smart comments without any evidence. I've read numerous articles by him and asked him for proof of what he's saying. He always replies, but without any proof, and with a few comments designed to make you feel small and insignificant.
He's more of a politician than a journalist.
Go flame him.
iMac 27" i7, MacBook Pro i5, iMac G5 1.8GHz, iPhone, PowerBook 12" 1GHz, AppleTV, MOTU 828, Logic Studio, Ableton Live 7.
Bookmarks