image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old February 18th, 2004, 07:51 AM
karavite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Delta Quadrant
Posts: 1,184
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
karavite is an unknown quantity at this point
Intel gives in on 64 bit chips "for the rest of us"

Hi All,

FYI, see this article in the NYTimes, "Intel Concedes 64-Bit Chips Are Wave of the Future"

And yes you have to register, but it is free and for crying out loud it is the New York Times!
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/18/te...gy/18chip.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 18th, 2004, 08:40 AM
Randman's Avatar
HA! HA! HA!
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,999
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Randman is on a distinguished road
Quote:
and for crying out loud it is the New York Times!
Ever see the corrections lists on the NYT? As a journalist, the Times' reputation is spotty. The Pulitzers were deserved for the 9-11 packages, but so were the brickbats for the Jayson Blair scandal.
That said, nice of Intel to say so.
__________________
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 18th, 2004, 02:37 PM
karavite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Delta Quadrant
Posts: 1,184
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
karavite is an unknown quantity at this point
As a responsible "consumer" of news, the NYTimes is only one of many resources I view almost every day! Any way, the main issue I was implying is every time I post a NYTimes link, people whine about the registration. It is no big deal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 18th, 2004, 02:53 PM
WeeZer51402's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lost in my own unintelligible ramblings
Posts: 475
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WeeZer51402 is on a distinguished road
Hmm that was a bit dissappointing, i guess the whole world revolves around intel/AMD, i loved the little apple blurb though.....<irritated></irritated>
__________________
ON THE WAY:
15" PB 1.67|100|1024 --- 10.4
------------------------------------------
17" iMac G5 1.8|80|512|BT --- 10.3.9
FrankenMac G4 500|55|640 --- 10.3.9
PowerMac 9600 300|4|512 --- 1.2
eMachine 500is 500|4.3|196 --- OpenStep 4.2
Server 2.3|260|512 --- FedoraCore
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 19th, 2004, 07:45 AM
karavite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Delta Quadrant
Posts: 1,184
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
karavite is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeZer51402
Hmm that was a bit dissappointing, i guess the whole world revolves around intel/AMD, i loved the little apple blurb though.....<irritated></irritated>
Exactly - it was sort of an, "Oh and by the way Macs have had this for a while..." Wasn't Apple ahead on 32 bit chips too?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 19th, 2004, 10:20 AM
WeeZer51402's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lost in my own unintelligible ramblings
Posts: 475
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WeeZer51402 is on a distinguished road
Wasnt the chip in the LISA 32bit?
__________________
ON THE WAY:
15" PB 1.67|100|1024 --- 10.4
------------------------------------------
17" iMac G5 1.8|80|512|BT --- 10.3.9
FrankenMac G4 500|55|640 --- 10.3.9
PowerMac 9600 300|4|512 --- 1.2
eMachine 500is 500|4.3|196 --- OpenStep 4.2
Server 2.3|260|512 --- FedoraCore
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 19th, 2004, 11:17 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,074
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
Lisa and early Macintosh computers used the 16bit 68000 processor. The Macintosh II (68020) had a 32bit data path but was not '32bit clean', whatever that means. The Mac II also was quite a beast at its time (first 'headless Mac') and quite expensive.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old February 19th, 2004, 12:53 PM
karavite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Delta Quadrant
Posts: 1,184
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
karavite is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke
Lisa and early Macintosh computers used the 16bit 68000 processor. The Macintosh II (68020) had a 32bit data path but was not '32bit clean', whatever that means. The Mac II also was quite a beast at its time (first 'headless Mac') and quite expensive.
I remember panting over one of those Mac IIs - I think it was about $8000!!! Thank God I didn't have the spare cash at the time! Not that I have a spare $8000 these days either!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.