image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #9  
Old February 25th, 2004, 09:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,019
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 50 Posts
MisterMe will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedfreak
http://www.macnet2.com/more.php?id=459_0_1_0

Panther does some of this now but the way the article describes things this would be the real thing. Please Apple Please.
As one of the responsers on the MacNet site said, this sounds a lot like Services enhanced. However, the rumor is probably based on a misinterpretation of how Services will be enhanced.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old February 25th, 2004, 10:11 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,074
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
rbuenger says: "it's even one reson more for deleting MacOS and switch maybe even to windows. I want a small, secure and fully controlable system."

I don't see much logic here. I'm with you, though, don't want this all integrated and inseparable. I like Apple's thoughts in bringing us _separate_ iCal, Mail, iSync etc. And I don't think Apple will move away from this strategy anytime soon. However: Even if they're integrated won't mean you have to use them.

And: You want a "small, secure and fully controlable system"? We all know this just doesn't exist. Well, you could use linux and remove basically everything and work on the command line. ;-) We're way beyond 'small' with Mac OS X. But it is the most secure system around (beaten maybe only by Mac OS 9) and is quite controllable, too.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old February 25th, 2004, 10:43 AM
andychrist's Avatar
devil's plaything
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: E.Vil.
Posts: 832
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
andychrist is on a distinguished road
I'd like to see universal synchronization without universal integration.

As for VRT embedded in some future OS? It's hard to imagine that not happening.

The future is large.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old February 25th, 2004, 11:17 AM
Ricky's Avatar
Some Yahoo!
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,079
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ricky is on a distinguished road
Voice recognition?

I've been there before, and I don't like it.
__________________
Mac Pro Xeon 4x2.66 GHz | OS X 10.4.7, WinXP | 3 GB RAM | 250 GB HD | 250 GB HD | 300 GB HD
MacBook Core Duo 2.0 GHz | OS X 10.4.7 | 1 GB RAM | 80 GB HD
Mac mini Core Solo 1.5 GHz | OS X 10.4.7 and Windows XP SP2 | 512 MB RAM | 60 GB HD | 400 GB HD
Pentium 4 3.06 GHz | Windows XP SP2 and OS X 10.4.3 | 1.5 GB RAM | 100 and 120 GB HD
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old February 25th, 2004, 12:05 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,074
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
Yeah, I always imagine myself shouting at my iBook sitting in a train and think: "Nah, I'll rather just hit the keys..." - Apple-Esc to bring up LaunchBar, 'mail' and enter, Apple-N for a new message... Much faster than telling the computer what to do. And more quiet, too. ;-)
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old February 25th, 2004, 12:46 PM
Captain Code's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Captain Code will become famous soon enough
If they integrated everything into the OS that could be the biggest mistake Apple has ever made. There is no reason to do this. Stuff launches fast enough. This is the whole problem that people hate Microsoft for. Who want's IE part of the OS? Who wants Safari part of the OS and always running? The Framework is ok because you can delete it, but doing that already breaks some programs.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old February 25th, 2004, 01:03 PM
soulseek's Avatar
It's set to groove
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 373
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
soulseek is on a distinguished road
personally i think voice recognition sucks. even if its perfectly designed to work without any problems, its is slower!!!
for ppl like us who use their macs everyday, key combinations are much faster

i think the guy who wrote the article doesnt know what he's talkin about.
why would we wanna have apps in SYSTEM PREFERENCES instead of the applications folder ?
they're perfect where they are ! theyre in the applications folder and on the dock, fastest way to access them, and they work really well with each other

cummon any better suggestions for 10.4 ?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old February 25th, 2004, 01:34 PM
Captain Code's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Captain Code will become famous soon enough
It depends how low level they have it running. I don't think they could be so stupid as to have it running at the kernel level. The article seems to hint that they would load all the programs when the machine boots to make it faster to load the programs.

They can keep the iCal, Addressbook, Mail, etc integration without doing that.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet)
Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM
dferns@macosx.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.