image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #33  
Old September 6th, 2001, 03:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: trolland
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
macintroll is on a distinguished road
Talking

well i've just test your soft on my
dual G4 450 Mhz 768 Mo 20 G running osX 5G40.

first : i test with all my currents apps opens :
IE - Terminal - iTune playing - CPU monitor - "classic" - photoshop
my result was : 1,75 secs

( only on one processor i think

2° :
I close every things and relaunch the app :
time result : 1,64999999976158142 secs

quite the same no ? real multitask !!! yeah !
Well if it could have done on the two pross i should have found the result cut by 2 ?????

great !!!!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old September 6th, 2001, 06:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kidemet is on a distinguished road
Wink Titanium speed

Powerbook G4 Titanium on 500 MHz, 256 MB RAM

1.9500000 min
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old September 8th, 2001, 03:29 PM
knighthawk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 166
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
knighthawk is on a distinguished road
Quote:
first : i test with all my currents apps opens :
IE - Terminal - iTune playing - CPU monitor - "classic" - photoshop
my result was : 1,75 secs

( only on one processor i think 
The benchmark application only uses one processor, but OSX using both. This means that while one processor was doing the benchmark, the other was playing an iTunes song. One good way to see what your processor is doing is to open up the CPU monitor utility. This just shows total CPU usage. The Process Viewer utility shows in more detail what the processor is being used for. If you change the sampling rate from the default 20 secs to 5, you can get a better idea of what is going on. Run the benchmark while you are watching the Process Viewer, and you will see that every once in a while, the Login process appears. Also you see that at certain times, the Window Manager (Aqua?) jumps up to about 10-15% and then back down to normal 2-3%. I think both of these will be changed in the new version 10.1, and we will be able to see a slight increase in the times for this benchmark.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old September 9th, 2001, 01:42 AM
omegaroot's Avatar
Apprentice Codemonkey
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: U.S.
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
omegaroot is on a distinguished road
In case anyone is interested I ran a few benchmarks on my not so new dual 533 ( digital audio, no fancy codenames for me =( )running OS X 10.0.4, 256 Megs. of RAM, 7200(?) RPM stock 20 gig. ATA, Adaptec Ultra160 controller attached to a 10k RPM Quantum 9 gig. and a nVidia GeForce2 MX.
ok, here goes...

Quickbench Time: 1.38333332 (min.)
- i beleive it uses both CPUs indirectly cause i had other programs open at the time but none using the CPU, and while it was running CPU monitor showed both CPUs jumping up and down.

Altivec Fractal: 3351.4 MegaFLOPs (4.0 sec)

On the lighter side everyone seems to complain about OS X being slow. In X my DP is only a little bit slower, but greatly makes up for it with the multithreaded system. Ill be happy to take the speed hit considering it all even out when you add all the hangs you can run into in 9 while awaiting something to render/get connection/etc....

just my 2 cents though....
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old September 10th, 2001, 01:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tbartus is on a distinguished road
I took 2.76 when I had Netscape, StuffIt, Mail, Internet Connect open and 2.23 when I closed them all.

System>

iMac DV 400 Mhz
640 MB RAM
10 GB Hard Drive
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old January 15th, 2009, 03:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
phammybly is on a distinguished road
mine goes a bit faster

i got 0.483333318762 minutes
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old January 15th, 2009, 03:30 AM
Doctor X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 901
Thanks: 67
Thanked 61 Times in 59 Posts
Doctor X will become famous soon enough
7 and a half years . . . that has to be a record for:

T3h D34dly Thr34d N3cr0m4ncy!!11!!


*Downloads Application to Check*

--J.D.
__________________
MacBook 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 6 Gig RAM, 10.6.1
Fear Me! FEAR ME!

His secrets are not sold cheaply.
It is perilous to waste his time.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old January 15th, 2009, 03:34 AM
Doctor X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 901
Thanks: 67
Thanked 61 Times in 59 Posts
Doctor X will become famous soon enough
0.5166666507720947 minutes.

Tried it again: 0.449999988079071 minutes!

Do I win?

--J.D.
__________________
MacBook 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 6 Gig RAM, 10.6.1
Fear Me! FEAR ME!

His secrets are not sold cheaply.
It is perilous to waste his time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A bit of nostalgia: A Salute to Mac OS X simX Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 31 March 24th, 2005 07:45 AM
HP Photosmart 1315 and USB Print Sharing zwheeloc Mac Classic System & Software 12 February 6th, 2003 09:20 PM
apps list Mac Osxtopus Mac OS X System & Mac Software 7 May 29th, 2002 12:31 PM
Apple: Forget XP, try the Mac tagliatelle Bob's Place 1 November 25th, 2001 07:12 AM
Netscape 6.1 Profile Transfer from Mac OS 9.2.1 to Mac OS X chemistry_geek Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 0 October 12th, 2001 06:42 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.