image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Content & Information > Apple News, Rumors & Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old May 19th, 2005, 11:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
julianb is on a distinguished road
Outlook for OSX

Does anyone think we'll ever get a proper Outlook Exchange client for OSX?
We've used Entourage for 12 months now, and it just doesn't measure up.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old May 19th, 2005, 05:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,019
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 50 Posts
MisterMe will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by julianb
Does anyone think we'll ever get a proper Outlook Exchange client for OSX?
We've used Entourage for 12 months now, and it just doesn't measure up.
Entourage 2004 is supposed to be better.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old May 19th, 2005, 08:39 PM
serpicolugnut's Avatar
OS X Supreme Being
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Land of the free, home of the braves
Posts: 1,238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
serpicolugnut is on a distinguished road
it isn't...

Quote:
Entourage 2004 is supposed to be better.
I can tell you, it isn't. At least as an Exchange client. Entourage is a much better email client on the whole, but it doesn't interface with an Exchange network to the full level of Outlook. It's about 50% there. It's main deficiencies are:
1. Inability to have more than one Exchange mailbox. For example, my company uses several Exchange mailboxes that each member of our team has access to. These serve as queues for production, as well as general customer email boxes. With Entourage, I can't access any Exchange account but the one I'm assigned. Ridiculous.

2. No interface with Exchange notes. Any notes you create in Outlook, and can see in your Outlook Web Access, can't be seen in Entourage. To make matters worse, Entourage has it's own notes system, but it doesn't interface at all with Exchange. Pathetic.

3. Inability to assign tasks.

4. Limited ability in setting up meetings.

5. Interface with Exchange Address Book is severly limited. You don't get the full access you get with Outlook.

If Microsoft had "carbonized" Outlook 2001 for the Mac, I would have no need to use my PC at work. As it is, Entourage is barely usable as an Exchange client, and keeps the PC in use. For awhile, I even used Outlook 2001 in Classic because it was a full featured Exchange client. But with the release of 10.3.5, it stopped working, so I had to go back to the PC.

Microsoft clearly does this on purpose. Users of Entourage have been yelling for full Exchange server compatability for years, and Microsoft refuses to implement it.
__________________
Powerbook G4 17"/1.5ghz/1GB RAM - OS X
iBook 12"/1.2ghz/512MB RAM - OS X
AMD 2200 XP/512MB RAM/WinXP
Visit OS X Factor - OS X News & Resources
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old May 19th, 2005, 10:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 3,019
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 50 Posts
MisterMe will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by serpicolugnut
I can tell you, it isn't. At least as an Exchange client. Entourage is a much better email client on the whole, but it doesn't interface with an Exchange network to the full level of Outlook. It's about 50% there. It's main deficiencies are:
1. Inability to have more than one Exchange mailbox. For example, my company uses several Exchange mailboxes that each member of our team has access to. These serve as queues for production, as well as general customer email boxes. With Entourage, I can't access any Exchange account but the one I'm assigned. Ridiculous.

2. No interface with Exchange notes. Any notes you create in Outlook, and can see in your Outlook Web Access, can't be seen in Entourage. To make matters worse, Entourage has it's own notes system, but it doesn't interface at all with Exchange. Pathetic.

3. Inability to assign tasks.

4. Limited ability in setting up meetings.

5. Interface with Exchange Address Book is severly limited. You don't get the full access you get with Outlook.

If Microsoft had "carbonized" Outlook 2001 for the Mac, I would have no need to use my PC at work. As it is, Entourage is barely usable as an Exchange client, and keeps the PC in use. For awhile, I even used Outlook 2001 in Classic because it was a full featured Exchange client. But with the release of 10.3.5, it stopped working, so I had to go back to the PC.

Microsoft clearly does this on purpose. Users of Entourage have been yelling for full Exchange server compatability for years, and Microsoft refuses to implement it.
Thanks for your assessment. Next week, I will replace my old beige G3 running Outlook 2001 under MacOS 9.2.2 at work with my new G5. So far, Apple Mail/iCal have better Exchange compatibility than I expected. If I am to believe you--and I have no reason not to--I cannot expect appreciably greater Exchange compatibility when I install Office 2004.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old May 20th, 2005, 03:58 AM
HomunQlus's Avatar
Artifical Lifeform
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
HomunQlus is on a distinguished road
You're better off using Thunderbird.
__________________

Mac OS X User for life

"You know what is worse than being all alone in the night, captain?
To be all alone in the crowd."
- Ambassador Delenn


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old May 20th, 2005, 04:35 AM
ora's Avatar
ora ora is online now
free electron
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,277
Thanks: 44
Thanked 63 Times in 62 Posts
ora is on a distinguished road
Is thunderbird fully exchange compatible? For me, the need isn't for the best email client, or i'd be on thunderbird or Mail, but one that is able to deal with my work systems, which are exchange based.As it stands, Entourage is the best, though it is still a piece or c$@p as software goes, and only gives me very limited exchange functionality.

NB serpicolugnut- you can access multiple exchange accounts, but you need to set up different identities, and switch between them to do it. Its a hassle but it does work at a pinch.

I just wish work would ditch ms products, but its not going to happen anytime soon, its a battle enough to keep the mac support going.
__________________
How to ask questions sensibly
--Macbook unibody 2.4ghz, 4gb ram, 500gb HD, glossy, OS 10.6.1
--Homebrew PC, iPhone, many hard drives, Nikon D200
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old May 20th, 2005, 04:47 AM
HomunQlus's Avatar
Artifical Lifeform
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
HomunQlus is on a distinguished road
As far as I know Thunderbird is fully Exchange compatible.
__________________

Mac OS X User for life

"You know what is worse than being all alone in the night, captain?
To be all alone in the crowd."
- Ambassador Delenn


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old May 20th, 2005, 06:15 AM
ora's Avatar
ora ora is online now
free electron
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 2,277
Thanks: 44
Thanked 63 Times in 62 Posts
ora is on a distinguished road
I just checked it out, and it seems to only deal with exchange accounts via IMAP, and this only gives limited functionality, less than in Entourage. I'd love to be wrong, but i think i'm still stuck with Entourage.
__________________
How to ask questions sensibly
--Macbook unibody 2.4ghz, 4gb ram, 500gb HD, glossy, OS 10.6.1
--Homebrew PC, iPhone, many hard drives, Nikon D200
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.