|
#57
| ||||
| ||||
| to macluv: all this predicting of posts doesn't mean anything, you merely altered something you wrote before *after* someone else wrote something else and said that it happened, technically after and not before it happened
__________________ —XAQ ||| iMac G4 | 15" LCD | 800mhz | 512 mb ram | 60 gig HD | Mac OS X 10.3.1 | Super-Drive ||| |
|
#58
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Time time time..... MacLuv, The thread can only be used as a history of events (post), and not for travel in time to those events. Like history, a thread can be altered later to show events that didn't actually happen (editing of post by members, moderator and administrator). In that way a thread is no more valid a reference than a diary. When I spoke of reference frames I was treating every event as being completely unique in space-time. Every event has a unique place in time and a unique place in space. We are constantly traveling away from any given event in both space and time. To travel in time back to some event you would also need to find it's place in space. Because the universe is not static (the Earth rotates on it's axis, the Earth orbits the Sun, the Sun orbits within our galaxy, and the galaxies move apart with the expansion of the universe) finding the relative space where an event took place would be as hard as producing time travel to begin with. When dealing with most of the equations used in relativistic theory, we tend to normalize all the parts... that is make the units of measurement the same for all elements, and then treat the parts as unified (in this case space-time is treated as a four manifold called Minkowski space). From there we would enter the area in which I specialized which was the differential topological nature of m, m+1 and m+n manifolds (I worked in mathematics, not physics, so I didn't stay with the strict modeling of nature). ![]() Anyway, that was what I would consider the biggest hurdle to any theory of time travel. Traveling in time is also traveling in space, and the distances between us and past events get larger by the second. As it can not be produced, no one has yet to invent it. The concept is universal (one doesn't need science to wish to change or revisit the past), so the first person to conceive of it would most likely be unrecorded. But I would like to hear who you think invented it. Quote:
Also the theory of relativity predicts (and has been observed) that all of the dimensions are distorted by gravitation and velocity. The Lorentz transformation applies to both space and time of any reference frame. And the only fixed frame of reference is the speed of light (which is constant in all frames of reference). Light is effected by gravitation so time is also effected. Inside a reference frame which is moving, (which everything is) the speed of light must appear as a constant. That means that both space and time must be altered to make it appear as that constant (again by using the Lorentz transformation). Quote:
|
|
#59
| ||||
| ||||
| After seeing MacLuv's returning post and the ensuing posts of various users, I feel like I've just watch Star Wars, A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back, back to back. ![]() I am still awaiting the Return of the Jedi. ![]() |
|
#60
| ||||
| ||||
| The first time traveler was the first person to read a book/wall/symbol. The inventor of Time Travel was the author of the book/wall/symbol. Go Read.
__________________ http://www.thinktwisted.com The only solution is revolution. |
|
#61
| ||||
| ||||
| Do I win? ![]()
__________________ http://www.thinktwisted.com The only solution is revolution. |
|
#62
| ||||
| ||||
| I don't think reading a book counts as time travel. In that case, doing anything is time travel because you are interacting with something that *was* in the past.
__________________ —XAQ ||| iMac G4 | 15" LCD | 800mhz | 512 mb ram | 60 gig HD | Mac OS X 10.3.1 | Super-Drive ||| |
|
#63
| ||||
| ||||
| what time is it? |
|
#64
| ||||
| ||||
| 6:54 EST
__________________ —XAQ ||| iMac G4 | 15" LCD | 800mhz | 512 mb ram | 60 gig HD | Mac OS X 10.3.1 | Super-Drive ||| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Authoritative Partitioning Discussion | mr. k | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 13 | November 11th, 2003 07:26 PM |
| t68i isync time sync problem | boi | Hardware & Peripherals | 2 | June 10th, 2003 04:46 AM |
| Time Travel | ScottW | Bob's Place | 18 | April 30th, 2003 09:39 PM |
| regular users cannot set date and time | solrac | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 0 | August 12th, 2002 04:02 AM |
| ntp time sync problem | WhateverJoe | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 1 | September 20th, 2001 11:56 AM |