image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Bob's Place

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #57  
Old December 8th, 2002, 12:24 PM
xaqintosh's Avatar
Master of Reality
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In a dreamworld paralleling your earth in time and space...
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
xaqintosh is on a distinguished road
to macluv: all this predicting of posts doesn't mean anything, you merely altered something you wrote before *after* someone else wrote something else and said that it happened, technically after and not before it happened
__________________
—XAQ
||| iMac G4 | 15" LCD | 800mhz | 512 mb ram | 60 gig HD | Mac OS X 10.3.1 | Super-Drive |||
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old December 8th, 2002, 01:28 PM
RacerX's Avatar
Old Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: US version of Siberia
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
RacerX will become famous soon enoughRacerX will become famous soon enough
Re: Time time time.....

MacLuv,

The thread can only be used as a history of events (post), and not for travel in time to those events. Like history, a thread can be altered later to show events that didn't actually happen (editing of post by members, moderator and administrator). In that way a thread is no more valid a reference than a diary.

When I spoke of reference frames I was treating every event as being completely unique in space-time. Every event has a unique place in time and a unique place in space. We are constantly traveling away from any given event in both space and time. To travel in time back to some event you would also need to find it's place in space. Because the universe is not static (the Earth rotates on it's axis, the Earth orbits the Sun, the Sun orbits within our galaxy, and the galaxies move apart with the expansion of the universe) finding the relative space where an event took place would be as hard as producing time travel to begin with. When dealing with most of the equations used in relativistic theory, we tend to normalize all the parts... that is make the units of measurement the same for all elements, and then treat the parts as unified (in this case space-time is treated as a four manifold called Minkowski space). From there we would enter the area in which I specialized which was the differential topological nature of m, m+1 and m+n manifolds (I worked in mathematics, not physics, so I didn't stay with the strict modeling of nature).



Anyway, that was what I would consider the biggest hurdle to any theory of time travel. Traveling in time is also traveling in space, and the distances between us and past events get larger by the second.

As it can not be produced, no one has yet to invent it. The concept is universal (one doesn't need science to wish to change or revisit the past), so the first person to conceive of it would most likely be unrecorded. But I would like to hear who you think invented it.

Quote:
Originally posted by brianleahy
Likewise, there are no fixed reference frames for spatial travel either, yet it is possible.
Not really. Actually spatial travel can not be removed from time travel. We all move from place to place within a dynamic system which is changing over time. But to travel backwards in time would require moving the system backward to also find the exact event.

Also the theory of relativity predicts (and has been observed) that all of the dimensions are distorted by gravitation and velocity. The Lorentz transformation applies to both space and time of any reference frame. And the only fixed frame of reference is the speed of light (which is constant in all frames of reference). Light is effected by gravitation so time is also effected. Inside a reference frame which is moving, (which everything is) the speed of light must appear as a constant. That means that both space and time must be altered to make it appear as that constant (again by using the Lorentz transformation).

Quote:
If backward time travel is possible, then it seems logical that these - and perhaps other - forces would govern an object's timelike path.
Actually, as travel backwards in time is not possible, the idea that you could have the forces that governed our movement forward to help you would not be a factor (in a system where it was possible, maybe though, but we would see time travelers moving with us then as they would have to co-exist in with us to have those same forces act on them). Most theories of time travel require a bridge between the two relative places in space-time. Also, as I pointed out earlier, moving freely backwards in time intoduces conservation of energy problems (though that is most likely not the part of the subject that people would find interesting, it is a governing and restrictive factor none the less).
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old December 9th, 2002, 03:59 PM
kendall's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,089
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kendall is on a distinguished road
After seeing MacLuv's returning post and the ensuing posts of various users, I feel like I've just watch Star Wars, A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back, back to back.

I am still awaiting the Return of the Jedi.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old December 9th, 2002, 06:32 PM
JohnnyV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,420
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
JohnnyV is on a distinguished road
The first time traveler was the first person to read a book/wall/symbol. The inventor of Time Travel was the author of the book/wall/symbol. Go Read.
__________________
http://www.thinktwisted.com

The only solution is revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #61  
Old December 9th, 2002, 06:32 PM
JohnnyV's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,420
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
JohnnyV is on a distinguished road
Do I win?
__________________
http://www.thinktwisted.com

The only solution is revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old December 9th, 2002, 06:38 PM
xaqintosh's Avatar
Master of Reality
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In a dreamworld paralleling your earth in time and space...
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
xaqintosh is on a distinguished road
I don't think reading a book counts as time travel. In that case, doing anything is time travel because you are interacting with something that *was* in the past.
__________________
—XAQ
||| iMac G4 | 15" LCD | 800mhz | 512 mb ram | 60 gig HD | Mac OS X 10.3.1 | Super-Drive |||
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old December 9th, 2002, 06:52 PM
kendall's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,089
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kendall is on a distinguished road
what time is it?
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old December 9th, 2002, 06:54 PM
xaqintosh's Avatar
Master of Reality
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In a dreamworld paralleling your earth in time and space...
Posts: 1,834
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
xaqintosh is on a distinguished road
6:54 EST
__________________
—XAQ
||| iMac G4 | 15" LCD | 800mhz | 512 mb ram | 60 gig HD | Mac OS X 10.3.1 | Super-Drive |||
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Authoritative Partitioning Discussion mr. k Mac OS X System & Mac Software 13 November 11th, 2003 07:26 PM
t68i isync time sync problem boi Hardware & Peripherals 2 June 10th, 2003 04:46 AM
Time Travel ScottW Bob's Place 18 April 30th, 2003 09:39 PM
regular users cannot set date and time solrac Mac OS X System & Mac Software 0 August 12th, 2002 04:02 AM
ntp time sync problem WhateverJoe Mac OS X System & Mac Software 1 September 20th, 2001 11:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.