| |||||||
| View Poll Results: What Mac OS | |||
| 10.4 | | 19 | 67.86% |
| 10.3 | | 7 | 25.00% |
| 10.2 | | 0 | 0% |
| 10.1 | | 0 | 0% |
| 10.0 | | 0 | 0% |
| 9 | | 0 | 0% |
| 8 | | 1 | 3.57% |
| 7 | | 0 | 0% |
| 6 | | 0 | 0% |
| other please state in post! | | 1 | 3.57% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| What mac os? click the option what you prefer
__________________ iMac G5 1.8Ghz 1GB Powermac G4 Quicksilver 2.0Ghz 6GB White MacBook 2.1Ghz 4GB Powermac G4 800Mhz 2GB Powermac G3 400Mhz 512MB |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| My preferred Mac OS didn't make the list. ![]() Mac OS X Server 1.2 (Rhapsody 5.6)
__________________ _____________________________________________ Rhapsody Resource Page |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| lol... I PREFER to work on Mac OS X 10.4.... but I really DO have a soft spot for System 7.x .... very clean, while still having a good amount of features. I suppose it's only real downfall when compared with other "classic" Mac OS systems is that when you copy files, you can't multitask.
__________________ -Adam S ... PowerBook G4 (Mac OS X... the latest version, whatever it is, I've got it, dangit) and original iPod (iLove music, therefore iLove iPod) <shamelessplug>http://www.geocities.com/adambyte</shamelessplug> |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| 8.6 was the pinnacle of the Mac OS as far as I'm concerned. I don't actually work in it anymore, since time has marched on and pulled me along, but I was very happy with it back in the day. I still don't really like OS X, but I use it because I have to use something. In OS X's defense, Exposé is freakin' awesome, and it's nice that I can (and do) go months without rebooting. ![]() 9.1 was pretty solid, too, but I still think OS 9 should've been called 8.7 and was only called "9" so they could get to 10 and use their stupid roman numeral... |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| While I did select 10.4, in regards to Classic I would pick System 7.5.x (because it runs nice and fast on something like my Quadra 650 and is free from Apple ), System 7.6.1 (because it brings a lot of what OS 8 had brought without the extra bloat...besides, the system hard disk on a 68K Mac won't use HFS+), and Mac OS 8.6 (because it implemented a lot of what OS 9 had, again without the excess bloat). ![]()
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04 |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| 10.3 was just clean effortless, simple, powerful, cool, and had little or no fault, that i can think of. 10.4 seemed like incomplete features for gimmicks sake.
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Interesting
__________________ iMac G5 1.8Ghz 1GB Powermac G4 Quicksilver 2.0Ghz 6GB White MacBook 2.1Ghz 4GB Powermac G4 800Mhz 2GB Powermac G3 400Mhz 512MB |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
).
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|