|
#17
| |||
| |||
| @ fryke: I thought I was cynical, but you sure walk away with the prize . |
|
#18
| ||||
| ||||
| Yes, yes, we're all cynical. That aside, I think Fryke is completely right. Marketing often has more hold on what makes a product than the engineers (with their dogoodery) can produce from their yenning mindsets. Software has become more bloated regardless of manner. I trust that Apple will start to turn around this hedonism to face real problems instead of inventing new ones.
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone |
|
#19
| ||||
| ||||
| yes, the dashboard clearly shows that apple is thinking about an efficient OS
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#20
| ||||
| ||||
| In a way: Yes. It's not _constantly_ in your face. But I agree that they should focus a little more on productivity. They do that as well, though: Better iCal/Mail.app integration for example coming our way. I just hope one can disable _any_ mentioning of templates in Mail.app 3.0. ![]()
__________________ macnews.net.tc is active again. MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5 iPhone 3G 16 GB white, AppleTV 1G 40 GB Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008. Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
The real genius coder was Bill Atkinson. He wrote a lot of the GUI code, that was both fast and burned onto the ROMs. That significantly reduced the amount of code that needed to be loaded from disk into RAM, and made it easier to convince developers to use a consistent user interface. |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| Thanks, I knew something was mixed up, but didn't know when posted. ![]() Anyway, Mac toolbox and other stuffs were ahead of the time. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|