|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Mac justification
I need info/articles that justify using a Mac over a Lenovo (Chinese IBM PC) .. please don't move forums, I need experienced designer feedback. OK. A little background. I work for a government agency. I have been here approx. 8 years. I have gone from a Power Mac running OS 7 with HD with 2 500MB partitions to my current G5 with dual 2.3 GHZ, 2 GB SDRAM running OS 10.4.6. So, I know the score. I run the usual apps ... Quark 6.5, Illus./Photoshop CS, MX 04 suite. None of these are Mac specific. With my G5 I figure I am still 3 to 5 years away from a new desktop machine. However, it is the policy of the current administration that when we do upgrade that our group will also honor the Lenovo contract. My Mac may be pryed from my cold dead fingers. But in the meantime, I know to come up with justification which IT guy (who assisted in purchasing my awesome G5) can give to his boss as justification why. Why did we do it? Off the top of my head, I can say that with my Mac I use mostly PostScript Type 1 fonts which look/react better when going thru a RIP and to press. But what else? IT boss asked,"Is there any proprietary software for a Mac not available to PC when dealing with publishing?" The answer of course is no. All the usual suspects I have, PC folks also have. And they work pretty much the same (from what I've been told.) And of course, there is the ability to run AppleScripts in Adobe products. I don't usually do this but I could. The PC offers nothing comparable from the little Googling I have done. But I don't run AppleScripts usually. So can anyone think of anything else? Much appreciated. Bill |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
Bosses like productive people. Would you be more productive on the Lenovo than you would on your Mac? I certainly wouldn't be. I'd take an older Mac over a brand-new Windows machine any day, and I'd also be more productive on a slower machine, even though I'm well versed in both OSs. You could argue that a platform switch would be like plucking you from Production (or whatever division of the company) and putting you into Sales or Financial Affairs or something -- basically, taking you out of your element and putting you somewhere that would require considerable time to get used to and be productive in. TCO is also a good indicator of systems... of course, good research isn't given away: http://www.pfeifferreport.com/store/...products_id=42 I don't think you'll find anything significantly better than this sample article for free, though: http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/22738.html
__________________ Mac mini 2.0GHz 10.6.2 • 4GB • 320GB • Superdrive • 4 x 1TB USB 2.0 • LED Cinema Display MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.6.2 • 4GB • 250GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM iPhone 3G 8GB • iPod Touch 8GB • iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T U-Verse 12Mb/1.5Mb http://www.jeffhoppe.com |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Macs are better for Design
Productivity can also equal cost savings. A mac may cost more initially, but more than pays for itself with efficiency. I've worked for YEARS on macs without sending one bad print file or ruining one print job. That's worth AT LEAST $500,000 of printing and that's a conservative estimate. Here's a great article on the Mac's overall lower support cost (your IT guy will love you even more for this too--less work for him to do): http://www.macintoshed.com/mac.html Here's a great thread on this very subject from the design perspective: http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=334013 Another fact to consider is that OS X provides for quick and seamless app switching that pcs just don't do well at all. Most creative agencies you'll ever talk to use macs because they are simply the best machine for the job. Would you use a pair of gardening shears to mow your lawn? The mac is the John Deer of the design realm.
__________________ For more of my thoughts on tech and design issues, please see my blog: http://thesalon.blogspot.com Last edited by Natobasso; April 19th, 2006 at 07:48 PM. Reason: And another thing |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
|
i have Safari, Firefox, Mail, iTunes, Adium, iCal, Address Book, iPhoto, Quicktime, Image Capture, Word, After Effects, Image Ready, Photoshop, Illustrator, Fetch FTP, Font Book, Flash 8, Flash Player, Dreamweaver, Preview, Amadeus, Text Edit, Activity Monitor, Handbrake, Disk Utility, CoverFlow, FreePops, and EarthDesk all running currently at the moment (!), and it's been this way for days. the computer is pretty much as fast as if there were none open. that would be part of my justification. that and exposé.
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery Last edited by bobw; April 20th, 2006 at 12:58 PM. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
I appreciate the feedback. The links to the Pfeiffer report looks interesting. I can't justify paying for the whole thing though. I really like the TCO angle. I have worked on Macs for over 10 years and with the exception of my Power Mac Motorola Star Mac clone of the 97 - 03 era I have never had any significant hardware or software problems. (The HD died twice and power supply went out in it ... but I digress.) The problem with IT people is that they want to make quick service calls to your PC. They need to quickly ping things or install print drivers etc. On my mac I've installed and updated ppds and maintained everything with the exception of some LAN networking stuff (which seemed minimal.) To better clarify my situation. I have one IT guy here in our office who has been great. He has ordered my current G5 and has been supportive. His boss, IT manager for all agencies has issued the new contract to purchase Lenovos (the G5 was purchased prior to the contract last year.) |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
OK, I'm done hijacking. Back to the topic at hand... :-p
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10 • Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu 9.10 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.10 |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
|
Hmm, interesting note about the StarMax unfortunately for me and my wallet about 5 years too late Mac Advantage in Prepress Workflow PostScript font technology (OpenType exists for both OS but fonts limited) Photoshop optimized to open large files with PowerPC processor Color managment Lower TCO (total cost of ownership on repairs) I am goolging each of this topics for reputable research links to back up these statements. But I need other bullets to add to the list. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
|
Add lower tco on it maintenance to your list… I've never had to have an IT help me with my mac. Though I have been using macs since 1983 so I have some experience. (Hence "Junior IT".)
__________________ For more of my thoughts on tech and design issues, please see my blog: http://thesalon.blogspot.com |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|