|
#9
| |||||
| |||||
| Quote:
Quote:
Hopefully someone else has had the same problem and knows a fix to it, but if they don't, you may want to find someone in your area that could take a closer look at this. Quote:
![]() As for the slow down, again it is hard to tell from here so I'll have to give the same as the above on this one too. Quote:
I would remind you that the desktop in Mac OS X is nothing more than a folder in your home directory. If you wanted, you could open a window, navigate to the desktop and view it in list view (something I miss every time I see my Mac OS 9 clients who keep dozens of items on their desktop) I guess I'm something at a lost with the file format of screen shots issue. I spend a huge amount of time writing tech articles, letters, web pages, etc., and have to take constant screen shots everyday. The PDF files the the system produces are image PDFs, that is they are like PDFs generated in Photoshop. I drag-and-drop these into both Photoshop and ImageReady and both handle them without any problems that I can see. Infact they handle them just like PSD, TIFF, JPEG and PICT files that I drag to those applications. If you are using these as you say, then the file type should play no part in how you are using them. Here is some advice that may make your day run a little better. In my first answer of this post I pointed out how you could set a file type to be opened by some default application of you choosing. Why not make all PDF files open with Photoshop? Then when you take a screen shot, you can double click on it, up pops Photoshop. Quote:
Also, as you seem to be having a number of issues that would seem to be related to resource forks on files, you could try adding .dfont to the end of a couple TrueType fonts (or copies of TrueType fonts) that you are having problems with as a test to see if the systems sees them any better. As a long time user of ATM Deluxe and ATR, I have little background with Suitcase, but many of my clients love it. edit: TrueBlue Last edited by RacerX; March 2nd, 2003 at 02:36 PM. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| This is what the info panel should look like when setting the default application for a file. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Thanks Racer! Been away on business for a few days, so I havn't even tried some of those solutions. I just didn't want too much time to pass by without some kind of response from me. There are too many good ideas in your post to get specific, but thanks for the instructions on the "get info"... and the idea about having my PDFs open in Photo is brilliant. The reason I stay away from them for what I need them for relates to the whole "sluggishness" problem. Imagine my frustration at already feeling like my apps are running slow, only to have them pop open Acrobat on me when I only wanted to view it in Photo!! ARRGGH!!! And chabig, thanks for the info on Snood X!! I was only kidding abou tit not being out for X, but only cuz I just assumed it wasn't!! Thanks, I'm going to download that first!! I will post back after I try out these ideas, again, I apreciate everybodys advice in advance! |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Well, It's been a few weeks and I have ironed out a few MINOR problems, thanks to Racer X and Chabig (thanks again!). However... The biggest issues for me are using Photoshop/ImageReady and Dreamweaver. This is how I make my living, and I have to say working in these programs in OS X is painful. I can't stand the snail-pace it takes to perform simple functions like layer effects, file/open, selections, locating basic fonts, etc. I am using the OS X native updates to these programs as well (DW MX, PS7/IR3) so it's not a case of needed to work in a program "built" for OS X. I have come to the conclusion that OS X, for me, was a major mistake. I'm sure users who are not using these programs, or have newer machines than I do (1st generation G4 400, 832 Mb), are not encountering these probs. I have to restart into 9 in order for me to be able to work productively (which means getting a reasonable ammount of work done quickly) and without frustration. I thank god I never upgraded to X at work, I would be totally screwed. Instead of the love-fest we all seem to have with it, a little "waiver" saying it might not be in your best interest to upgrade (or something) should have been released to those with older machines. I love OS X, so long as I'm not WORKING on my computer. |
|
#13
| ||||
| ||||
| First Gen G4 Having a first gen g4 could be the root of your problems. You are a graphics professional. You are using a PCI graphics subsystem, which is vastly inferior to the AGP standard (which itself is soon to be eclipsed by PCI Extreme, Hypertransport, etc.). Anyway, the point is, your computer will never be able to process the complex graphics of the OS and your chosen apps and display those graphics as fast as a system with a more modern graphics bus. If you had Quartz Extreme, you'd feel very, very differently. How can you address this without buying a new computer? Short answer is, buy a new computer. You're talking about a 4 year old machine. In a production capacity, that is ancient. I mean, I knew a guy who did all of his graphic design on an 8100 and stored it all on Zip disks until summer 2002, but he would have been much more productive with a new system, you see? Otherwise, you can upgrade your processor or, and here's something no one else suggested, which surprises me, is upgrade your video card. For about 100-125 bucks you can get a Radeon 7000 PCI card which has dual-display support, DVD support, 32 MB VRAM, S-Video and composite video output, and other bells and whisles and it will GREATLY improve the performance of apps that use HW accelleration on graphics cards. Just for reference, both of my main computers are PCI graphics-based. Blue and white G4 and a beige desktop-style G3. Both heavily tweeked and upgraded. I have Radeon 7000's in both of 'em. Hope this helps.
__________________ B&W G4 450 / 1024MB / 80 GB / Radeon 7000 G3 433 / 768MB / 32GB / Radeon 7000 |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Great solution or at least worth the shot, thedbp! I realize I should upgrade, but last year was a slow year biz wise for me and try to explain to the wife why I need ANOTHER mac! So I was hoping there would be an inexpensive way to at least try to fix this thing, it was working fine before the upgrade afterall. A new processor wasn't with it, since for about $1000 more I could just buy a new machine. But this video card idea, I never thought that a new card alone might help. I am goign tot order one today, thanks for the tips!! |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| not a problem.... glad i could be of (somewhat limited) help. I originally shelled out the clams for the card so I could get DVDs to work in Mac OS X (the hardware decoder card that I paid extra for in '99 was unsupported by X in '00). Lo and behold, I noticed incredible improvements in my graphics apps, and the OS in general. Plus now I can watch my DVDs on my TV. Sweet. Loved it so much I bought the company (i wish). Actually I just bought a second card for my beige G3 and got even more dramatic improvements over the paltry 6MB Rage Pro in that sucker. Put the DVD-ROM from my B&W into the beige when I upgraded to a SuperDrive and now the beige is DVD-capable too. Cheers!
__________________ B&W G4 450 / 1024MB / 80 GB / Radeon 7000 G3 433 / 768MB / 32GB / Radeon 7000 |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| thedbp, you are a genius. Simple as that. I just finished installing my Radeon 9000 card, which took all of 3 minutes, and my machine is hauling ass. Not only that, I could swear it looks better to boot. I never thought abotu video card, and never found anythign mentioning that in any of my searches. You fucken rule! Now on to my other MINOR issues with OS X!! by the way, your screen name... it doesn't stand for "the david bowie project", does it? I only ask cuz a friend of mine has used that term before and the acronym (the dbp)... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|