image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Design, Media, Programming & Scripting > Design & Media

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #9  
Old March 2nd, 2003, 02:28 PM
RacerX's Avatar
Old Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: US version of Siberia
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
RacerX will become famous soon enoughRacerX will become famous soon enough
Quote:
I hope this one works. I went into the apps Info dialog box, where do I enter this? I am just finishing having my ".PSD" open in "preview", so my frustration is fresh on the surface! These files are transferred between Office and Home via FTP or Firewire drive, either way same problem.
I should have been more clear on this one, sorry. You need to select some file, in this file.psd, bring up an info panel for that file. Select the section Open with: and choose the application you want. When you are done, if the application is the one you want as the default for all files of this type, press that change All... button.

Quote:
Whether I have created these files on my Mac at home or at work, same issue. Drag and Drop only works the first time you do it, when it is also launching the app. After that, it doesnt work even if I am holding the Command key down.
If the changes you make in the Info panel don't help this, then I'm at a loss. There are some problems which I can't fix via phone or correspondence, I would have to be there to see the problem in action to make a better assessment.

Hopefully someone else has had the same problem and knows a fix to it, but if they don't, you may want to find someone in your area that could take a closer look at this.

Quote:
Once Safari and Chimera iron out some more bugs, I will move full time over to those browsers when I am surfing. But I still need to test my work in IE, and will continue to need to work inside of it. All of these apps in OS X are slow to open, slow to bounce between and slow to respond.
I tend to only use Safari for quick browsing more than anything else (forums and new sites), otherwise OmniWeb for me.

As for the slow down, again it is hard to tell from here so I'll have to give the same as the above on this one too.

Quote:
I would like them to go to the root folder, or in a folder I can designate. Unfotunately, what is helpful to others in not helpful to me. I'm sure most people don't need to take over a dozen a day, so a snapshot on their dektop is not disorganized or cluttered. I need to view them by date, D and D several at a time and have them open quickly in either Photo or IReady. These files I need to import into PSD's, to build into other files. A PDF is not helpful to WORK with, Pict files were. I am not looking to save these, mail these or even share these. The snapshot is a tool in which we (my crew) work with to build other files. A JPG would be even better, and unfortunately with Jaguar, Tinker no longer works.
Not being Apple, I can't make changes to how the system works. There are threads on making the file format change, but I personally have never done it so I done know how it is done.

I would remind you that the desktop in Mac OS X is nothing more than a folder in your home directory. If you wanted, you could open a window, navigate to the desktop and view it in list view (something I miss every time I see my Mac OS 9 clients who keep dozens of items on their desktop)

I guess I'm something at a lost with the file format of screen shots issue. I spend a huge amount of time writing tech articles, letters, web pages, etc., and have to take constant screen shots everyday. The PDF files the the system produces are image PDFs, that is they are like PDFs generated in Photoshop. I drag-and-drop these into both Photoshop and ImageReady and both handle them without any problems that I can see. Infact they handle them just like PSD, TIFF, JPEG and PICT files that I drag to those applications. If you are using these as you say, then the file type should play no part in how you are using them.

Here is some advice that may make your day run a little better. In my first answer of this post I pointed out how you could set a file type to be opened by some default application of you choosing. Why not make all PDF files open with Photoshop? Then when you take a screen shot, you can double click on it, up pops Photoshop.

Quote:
I think another person answered this in another thread for me. OS X has probs with True Type and such? All of my fonts were moved into these library's, OS X apps just don't recognise all of them. Not wierd fonts like "Phil's Semi" but standards like "Helvetica Rounded" do not show up. I have to try Suitcase to see if this works, I used to be a ATM user, but maybe suitcase is the way to go.
Wow, that is a strange thing to here. Mac OS X's preferred font type is TrueType. Now some applications do like PostScript fonts better than TrueType (as you can imagine, many of them are from Adobe), but there is a solution. You could try converting some of your TrueType fonts to PostScript with TrueBlue.

Also, as you seem to be having a number of issues that would seem to be related to resource forks on files, you could try adding .dfont to the end of a couple TrueType fonts (or copies of TrueType fonts) that you are having problems with as a test to see if the systems sees them any better.

As a long time user of ATM Deluxe and ATR, I have little background with Suitcase, but many of my clients love it.

edit: TrueBlue

Last edited by RacerX; March 2nd, 2003 at 02:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old March 2nd, 2003, 02:38 PM
RacerX's Avatar
Old Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: US version of Siberia
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
RacerX will become famous soon enoughRacerX will become famous soon enough
This is what the info panel should look like when setting the default application for a file.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg info.jpg (28.3 KB, 17 views)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old March 3rd, 2003, 09:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fishbonex is on a distinguished road
Thanks Racer!

Been away on business for a few days, so I havn't even tried some of those solutions. I just didn't want too much time to pass by without some kind of response from me.

There are too many good ideas in your post to get specific, but thanks for the instructions on the "get info"... and the idea about having my PDFs open in Photo is brilliant. The reason I stay away from them for what I need them for relates to the whole "sluggishness" problem. Imagine my frustration at already feeling like my apps are running slow, only to have them pop open Acrobat on me when I only wanted to view it in Photo!! ARRGGH!!!

And chabig, thanks for the info on Snood X!! I was only kidding abou tit not being out for X, but only cuz I just assumed it wasn't!! Thanks, I'm going to download that first!!

I will post back after I try out these ideas, again, I apreciate everybodys advice in advance!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old March 28th, 2003, 07:24 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fishbonex is on a distinguished road
Well, It's been a few weeks and I have ironed out a few MINOR problems, thanks to Racer X and Chabig (thanks again!). However...

The biggest issues for me are using Photoshop/ImageReady and Dreamweaver. This is how I make my living, and I have to say working in these programs in OS X is painful. I can't stand the snail-pace it takes to perform simple functions like layer effects, file/open, selections, locating basic fonts, etc. I am using the OS X native updates to these programs as well (DW MX, PS7/IR3) so it's not a case of needed to work in a program "built" for OS X.

I have come to the conclusion that OS X, for me, was a major mistake. I'm sure users who are not using these programs, or have newer machines than I do (1st generation G4 400, 832 Mb), are not encountering these probs. I have to restart into 9 in order for me to be able to work productively (which means getting a reasonable ammount of work done quickly) and without frustration.

I thank god I never upgraded to X at work, I would be totally screwed. Instead of the love-fest we all seem to have with it, a little "waiver" saying it might not be in your best interest to upgrade (or something) should have been released to those with older machines. I love OS X, so long as I'm not WORKING on my computer.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old April 1st, 2003, 11:51 AM
thedbp's Avatar
Frantic Messenger of Hope
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thedbp is on a distinguished road
First Gen G4

Having a first gen g4 could be the root of your problems. You are a graphics professional. You are using a PCI graphics subsystem, which is vastly inferior to the AGP standard (which itself is soon to be eclipsed by PCI Extreme, Hypertransport, etc.).

Anyway, the point is, your computer will never be able to process the complex graphics of the OS and your chosen apps and display those graphics as fast as a system with a more modern graphics bus. If you had Quartz Extreme, you'd feel very, very differently.

How can you address this without buying a new computer? Short answer is, buy a new computer. You're talking about a 4 year old machine. In a production capacity, that is ancient. I mean, I knew a guy who did all of his graphic design on an 8100 and stored it all on Zip disks until summer 2002, but he would have been much more productive with a new system, you see?

Otherwise, you can upgrade your processor or, and here's something no one else suggested, which surprises me, is upgrade your video card. For about 100-125 bucks you can get a Radeon 7000 PCI card which has dual-display support, DVD support, 32 MB VRAM, S-Video and composite video output, and other bells and whisles and it will GREATLY improve the performance of apps that use HW accelleration on graphics cards.

Just for reference, both of my main computers are PCI graphics-based. Blue and white G4 and a beige desktop-style G3. Both heavily tweeked and upgraded. I have Radeon 7000's in both of 'em. Hope this helps.
__________________
B&W G4 450 / 1024MB / 80 GB / Radeon 7000
G3 433 / 768MB / 32GB / Radeon 7000
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old April 1st, 2003, 12:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fishbonex is on a distinguished road
Great solution

or at least worth the shot, thedbp!

I realize I should upgrade, but last year was a slow year biz wise for me and try to explain to the wife why I need ANOTHER mac! So I was hoping there would be an inexpensive way to at least try to fix this thing, it was working fine before the upgrade afterall. A new processor wasn't with it, since for about $1000 more I could just buy a new machine. But this video card idea, I never thought that a new card alone might help.

I am goign tot order one today, thanks for the tips!!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old April 2nd, 2003, 10:56 PM
thedbp's Avatar
Frantic Messenger of Hope
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thedbp is on a distinguished road
not a problem....

glad i could be of (somewhat limited) help. I originally shelled out the clams for the card so I could get DVDs to work in Mac OS X (the hardware decoder card that I paid extra for in '99 was unsupported by X in '00). Lo and behold, I noticed incredible improvements in my graphics apps, and the OS in general. Plus now I can watch my DVDs on my TV. Sweet. Loved it so much I bought the company (i wish). Actually I just bought a second card for my beige G3 and got even more dramatic improvements over the paltry 6MB Rage Pro in that sucker. Put the DVD-ROM from my B&W into the beige when I upgraded to a SuperDrive and now the beige is DVD-capable too. Cheers!
__________________
B&W G4 450 / 1024MB / 80 GB / Radeon 7000
G3 433 / 768MB / 32GB / Radeon 7000
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old April 4th, 2003, 08:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fishbonex is on a distinguished road
thedbp, you are a genius. Simple as that.

I just finished installing my Radeon 9000 card, which took all of 3 minutes, and my machine is hauling ass. Not only that, I could swear it looks better to boot. I never thought abotu video card, and never found anythign mentioning that in any of my searches. You fucken rule!

Now on to my other MINOR issues with OS X!!

by the way, your screen name... it doesn't stand for "the david bowie project", does it? I only ask cuz a friend of mine has used that term before and the acronym (the dbp)...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.