|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| The MAC conspiracy In this case it's clearly a widespread misunderstandung that Windows folks (also tech savvy ones) tend to fall victim to. It's supposed to read "Mac". MAC on the other hand is an acronym (in IT related matters) for Media Access Control (address). Other uses can be found here. Nevertheless, the Mac (notice my use or rather non-use of capital letters) community welcomes switchers of all trades ![]()
__________________ My personal Apple history (italic = dead): * 1993: Centris 610, upg -> PM 6100/60, OC to 80MHz * 1998: iMac [233MHz, 384MB, 10GB] * 2000: PowerBook G3 [233MHz, 384MB, 20GB] * 2003: PowerBook G4 [15", 867MHz, 1GB, 100GB], 10GB 2G iPod * 2004: 20GB 3G iPod, Airport Express * 2006: MBP [15", 2GHz, 2GB, 160GB] * 2007 : MBP C2D [15", 2.33GHz, 3GB, 160GB] * Plus about 15 mostly 2nd hand Macs I bought for my friends and family. About the less Mac centric me. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
RAID-0 (striping) on a single physical drive can only make drive access slower while decreasing reliability. It also makes it harder to use the drive on other computers. RAID-1 (mirroring) is also pointless on a single drive. It also decreases reliability, while not offering resiliency against corruption, and halving the amount of hard disk space available. RAID-5 (stripes and distributed parity) should technically be possible, but is an extremely poor choice for a single drive. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|