image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Hardware & Peripherals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old April 11th, 2008, 11:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mindbend is on a distinguished road
Fastest App Launch Hard Drive?

I'm planning for the next tower and I'd like to have my applications launching as quickly as possible. What is the consensus on this?

It seems like some form of RAID would be ideal, but from what I recall, this is not necessarily true for app launching, yes?

Also, what about SAS versus SATA?

15,000 versus 10,000 or 7,200 RPM?

It seems like the easy call would be to make a RAID out of 15,000 drives, but is this really worth it for app launching?

I'm not looking to shave a second or two off launch times, I'm looking to blow it out of the water. I'm sick and tired of CS3 apps taking forever and a day to launch.

So what say ye?
__________________
"You are" = you're • "It is" = it's • It's really that simple
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 12th, 2008, 12:30 AM
Mikuro's Avatar
Crotchety UI Nitpicker
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,507
Thanks: 4
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mikuro is on a distinguished road
Try this:

Load a CS3 app, and time it.
Quit it immediately.
Reload it, and time it again.

During the first load, OS X should cache all those files in RAM, making the second load faster (unless your system is really pressed for RAM, in which case that should be your primary concern). You might be able to get the initial load speed closer to the reload speed with a good HD setup, but I think it will be impossible to exceed that.

FWIW, when testing this with Photoshop on my system, the time drops from 23 seconds to 14 seconds (roughly). I had some other things running in the background that might have skewed things, though.
__________________
Mac mini — 1.25GHz G4, 1GB RAM — OS 10.5.5

Useful programs: Privoxy, Butler, ffmpegX, VLC, Perian, Tofu, Wcalc
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 12th, 2008, 12:56 PM
Lt Major Burns's Avatar
"Dicky" Charlteston-Burns
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,332
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lt Major Burns will become famous soon enough
i for one am never really phased by the amount of time a CS3 app takes to launch. it's a heavy app full of millions of lines of code. more importantly though, i only load up my cs3 apps about 15 times a year... if you have enough ram, there's really little need to ever quit apps, only for full system software updates...
__________________
Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5
20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head
iBook G3 700MHz
640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 12th, 2008, 10:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chesterton, Indiana
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mindbend is on a distinguished road
So it sounds like nobody has an answer.
__________________
"You are" = you're • "It is" = it's • It's really that simple
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 13th, 2008, 12:00 AM
Qion's Avatar
Uber Nothing
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In a democrazy.
Posts: 2,404
Thanks: 50
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Qion will become famous soon enough
The thing is that impatience (or productivity ) might lead to data loss down the road. 10k and 15k drives are more prone to failure than 7.2k drives because the parts are, obviously, moving faster. A non-mirrored RAID system is also x+1 more likely to fail, given that two, three, four drives are being accessed instead of just one. My personal favorite setup is two 7.2k drives in a RAID 0 with two more drives backing them up.
__________________
• 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon
• 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro
• 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo
• 8GB iPhone
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 13th, 2008, 02:07 AM
Satcomer's Avatar
In Geostationary Orbit
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,449
Thanks: 5
Thanked 48 Times in 46 Posts
Satcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by mindbend View Post
So it sounds like nobody has an answer.
Well a Mac user should know the place to check for speed tests is BareFeats. They do nothing more then testing Mac speeds with every conceivable thing a user could add/expand to a Mac. Just take a look at their results and decided what you want.
__________________
PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8(Rev A.), , 7 Gig RAM, Pioneer DVR-110, ATI X800XT, OS X 10.4.11 & 10.5.5, 23'' HD LCD
Mac Book Pro Core 2 Duo 2.16Mhz, SuperDrive, ATI X1600, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.5
1TB Time Capsule
5g iPod 30Gig White
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.