image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Hardware & Peripherals

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old July 7th, 2003, 08:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
myotherpc'samac is on a distinguished road
memory upgrade for powerbook 12"

I had to post this because I can't find anywhere where it's been definitively said already...

I'm new to mac, but have been using windows since pre 3.x days, and knew my way around it. WinXp thrives on extra memory, but 256mb would be enough for most people just running office and media player. I wasn't too happy with the way my lovely new powerbook was handling multiple apps, so I upgraded my powerbook 12" memory last night with a kingston 512mb SODIMM, hoping to see a slight improvement in performance when I have several apps open.

Can't believe it! Startup is faster, finder is faster, EVERYTHING is faster. I would have thought that 256mb would have been enough to run the OS alone - but 640mb makes such a huge difference to even the most basic operations. Mac must use RAM very differently (more?) than Windows did...

So if you're thinking about a RAM upgrade for your pbook - categorically, you should do it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 7th, 2003, 09:25 PM
Giaguara's Avatar
Chmod 760
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ~
Posts: 8,621
Thanks: 7
Thanked 99 Times in 98 Posts
Giaguara is a jewel in the roughGiaguara is a jewel in the roughGiaguara is a jewel in the rough
i agree! and on older machines that is even more noticeable, if you have a slower machine and can't or don't want to get a new one, more ram makes the difference
__________________
MacBook Pro | Dell Mini Inspiron 9 | Mac Mini | Newton 2000 | iPhone | @Work : Dell D620 & 2x20" + a lot of Macs | Workstation, VC & Fusion
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do.
~ Samuel Clemens | Rants | Photos
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 7th, 2003, 10:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
baldprof is on a distinguished road
The "RISC" chip (such as the G3 or G4) addresses memory differently from the x86 (intel) chip. So even the "mechanics" are different. OS X (as can all versions of Unix) can basically use all the memory the chip can address. The more memory, the more efficient it can be.

For Win2k and probably XP, the OS really can't fully utilize memory above 512k. I don't know why exactly, but everything I have read has mentioned that fact.

I don't know how linux manages memory so I don't know how extra memory would affect that.

Every computer I have bought, I have always at least doubled the standard amount of memory.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Authoritative Partitioning Discussion mr. k Mac OS X System & Mac Software 15 January 9th, 2009 08:19 AM
memory issues (please help!) laboboy Mac Classic System & Software 2 April 30th, 2003 06:00 PM
G3 266 memory upgrade pry3i Hardware & Peripherals 3 March 21st, 2003 07:12 PM
Memory Usage Getter 2.0 is out! simX Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 24 February 28th, 2002 12:31 AM
Disabling VM musey79 Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 4 October 8th, 2001 09:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.