LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote90% chances that the G3 900 MHz will help you more than the 500 MHz G4. And you'll have less compatibility problems.
The Answer to Mac Support 
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: G3 900 or G4 500 Upgrade?
- February 1st, 2004, 07:22 AM #1
Registered User
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 1
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
G3 900 or G4 500 Upgrade? Hi!
Need some buying advice here!
I have a B&W G3 400mhz with 640ram running 10.3.2
What do you think the best bang for the buck would be
G3 900 or a G4 500 upgrade? I wil be using it as a home
machine for web and music. I have a quicksilver G4 allready
for the more heavystuff.
Regards
Stuart Sharman
- February 1st, 2004, 07:26 AM #2
Maverlous Da Vinci
- Join Date
- Nov 2001
- Location
- Inside the black box, CH
- Posts
- 4,027
- Thanks
- 3
- Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" and a MacBook Pro 13" with MacOS X 10.6. My oldest Apple was born in 1977.
GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+ PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y?
Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time.
- February 1st, 2004, 08:53 AM #3
Desertchild
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Location
- Germany
- Posts
- 6,658
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Definitely G3 900!
iBook 600; 12''; 640mb; 8mb Rage; DVD-CDRW-Combo, 20GB
P4 1.6; 2x80GB Raid1 (file-server)
tiBook 1Ghz, Superdrive, 768MB, 64mb 9000, 60GB
- February 1st, 2004, 10:01 AM #4
HA! HA! HA!
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Posts
- 2,999
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
G3
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
- February 1st, 2004, 11:08 AM #5
Registered User
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Mid-Atlantic
- Posts
- 185
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
G3 900. It's faster than the G4 500 (which isn't that much faster than what you have).
The G4 500 would only be a better choice if you used graphic-intensive applications all the time, like Photoshop, that take advantage of Altivec.GraphicUmp :lol:
1.83 Core Duo mini w/lots of goodies
12" iBook G4/1.2 w/100 GB HD & 1.25 GB RAM
LaserWriter Pro 630, 20 GB iPod photo
- February 1st, 2004, 11:26 AM #6
Evil PPC Tweaker
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 645
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nah, the G4 500 isn't a better choice, period... the boost even from Altivec isn't enough to match the G3 900. Go with the G3 900 and you will be glad you did. The only reason why I would opt for the slower G4 is if you do development and want a proper testing senario for Altivec code.
iMac G5 2.0Ghz (10.4.x, Main System)
MacBook 1.83Ghz (...Feburary)
"Sometimes I drive to run from all my demons \ Sometimes I drive so I can be alone \ Sometimes I drive to see the world in different light \ Sometimes I drive for no reason at all" - Assemblage 23, Drive
- February 1st, 2004, 12:08 PM #7
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Omaha, Ne
- Posts
- 215
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/G3CARDS/p...800/index.html
This is a series of tests between a g4/500 upgrad and a g3/800 upgrade, it should give you an idea of which one will suit you best.
Of course you could always go with one of the newer g4 upgrade cards, now up to 1 Gig.....
- February 1st, 2004, 04:18 PM #8
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- Oxford, UK
- Posts
- 2,497
- Thanks
- 0
- Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm actually quite surprised that the G4/500 does that well. I had expected the G3/800 to stomp all over the G4/500 but it doesn't appear to be the case. And that's with OS 10.1.5. AFAIK, Panther did add more Altivec optimizations, so you might get better scores if those benchmarks were run on Panther.
Bookmarks