|
#1
October 15th, 2001, 10:29 AM
| |||
| |||
| G4 (Dual 800 or 867) Which one?
How much faster is a Dual 800mhz G4 compared to the 867? I am considering paying the extra $ and just getting the Dual 800, but I am not sure how much faster in the real world the Dual 800 really is. I do not do any 3D Animation, and do a bit of Photoshop. Would the Dual 800 really be that much faster...noticably faster? I think that having two G4s is really cool, but is it worth the $? So, in the real world, how much faster is the Dual 800 than the 867 when not only being used for heavy animation/graphics? Thanks for the help, Dave
__________________ G4 Tower Dual 800mhz Quicksilver, 80GB, SuperDrive, 1.1GB RAM, 17" Studio Display, OS X 10.1  |
 |
| Bookmarks |
« USB hub problems
|
How can I get apache to serve my local website without a network connection?? »
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dual 867 MHz fan unbearably loud | ynotsmile | Hardware & Peripherals | 7 | October 31st, 2002 11:46 AM |
| emac vs. 733 Quicksilver and 867 Dual | pbmac | Hardware & Peripherals | 2 | August 19th, 2002 03:39 PM |
| Dual 800 or 867 G4 under OS X 10.1? | djubelirer | Hardware & Peripherals | 5 | October 16th, 2001 11:08 PM |
| G4 (Dual 800 or 867) Which One? | djubelirer | Hardware & Peripherals | 9 | October 16th, 2001 03:33 PM |
| Dual 800 PowerMac | rharder | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 9 | August 16th, 2001 10:23 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.
