|
#9
October 16th, 2001, 03:15 PM
| |||
| |||
| OS X has really good DP support so the dual 800MHz might feel like 1.6GHz (maybe, don't quote me on this). If you get OS X, get a DP. If you plan on using 9, don't bother with DO because you won't see much of a difference.
__________________ scope PowerMac G4 400MHz AGP, Radeon AGP, 54GB hard drive space, 512MB RAM, Mac OS X 10.1.5 and 10.2, Mac OS 9.2.2, ASD 17" Monitor, Altec Lansing APT5 Stereo System, APS Tech 8x4x32x CD-RW Drive. | PowerMac G3 233MHz with stuff. | PowerMac 8500/120 with other stuff.... | 6100/60 acting as network firewall. |  |
|
#10
October 16th, 2001, 03:33 PM
| |||
| |||
| clarification For clarification I only use OS X 10.1 I never use OS 9 by itself. So, theoretically would the Dual 800 be like having one 1.6ghz G4 (give or take a little) all of the time. If this is the case it seems worth it. Any other opinions are greatly appreciated. Thanks David
__________________ G4 Tower Dual 800mhz Quicksilver, 80GB, SuperDrive, 1.1GB RAM, 17" Studio Display, OS X 10.1 |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dual 867 MHz fan unbearably loud | ynotsmile | Hardware & Peripherals | 7 | October 31st, 2002 11:46 AM |
| emac vs. 733 Quicksilver and 867 Dual | pbmac | Hardware & Peripherals | 2 | August 19th, 2002 03:39 PM |
| Dual 800 or 867 G4 under OS X 10.1? | djubelirer | Hardware & Peripherals | 5 | October 16th, 2001 11:08 PM |
| G4 (Dual 800 or 867) Which one? | djubelirer | Hardware & Peripherals | 0 | October 15th, 2001 10:29 AM |
| Dual 800 PowerMac | rharder | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 9 | August 16th, 2001 10:23 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.
