image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Hardware & Peripherals

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old October 16th, 2001, 03:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
djubelirer is on a distinguished road
Dual 800 or 867 G4 under OS X 10.1?

My uses:

Only use OS X 10.1 (never use OS 9)

Never do heavy 3D Rendering or Animation (use the computer for research on the internet and writing papers, MP3, burning, photos, etc)

Now, since I am only using OS X 10.1, would the Dual 800 be like a 1.6ghz G4 in all programs, and be significantly faster all of the time?

Would the Dual 800 last much longer in terms of being outdated?

So, is the Dual 800 worth the price increase when you are only using OS X, and this computer is not solely for graphics rendering etc??

Thanks for the help...it is greatly appreciated.

I posted something earlier, but I forgot to clarify the only using OS X 10.1 part, which is extremely important.

David
__________________
G4 Tower Dual 800mhz Quicksilver, 80GB, SuperDrive, 1.1GB RAM, 17" Studio Display, OS X 10.1
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 16th, 2001, 04:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
buggs1a is on a distinguished road
A dual cpu mac or any computer will outlast single cpu computers. Dual cpu and mac os 10.1 is what you want. match made in heaven. i was at comp usa last night and used their dual 800 with 256mb ram and 10.1 and all i can say is, well, not much. it floored my mouth it was so screaming fast. i have an Athlon 1.33ghz with 768mb ram and the dual 800 opened mail faster then OE does on my pc sometimes, IE opened even faster sometimes. QT opened way faster then on my pc.
I'll just say the dual 800 flied.
everything in 10.1 and so on takes advantage of the dual cpu. so if you say try to open 5 apps at the same time, the dual would open them so fast it would be like opening one app on a single cpu mac almost. it's that fast.

I've got a dual 450 and single 450 mac and when i open 3 or 4 apps at once on the dual, it takes about the same time as maybe 1 or 2 apps do on my single. so it's a lot nicer. i say dual all the way. then also when you go to sell your mac, you'll get a lot more for it then you would a single.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 16th, 2001, 04:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: University of Betelgeuse V
Posts: 268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wyvern is on a distinguished road
yeah dp 800 is nice. Oftentimes a demanding process (like photoshop) can entirely take over one processor and leave the other processor to keep the OS and the app you are working in (if you've switched out of PS) running snappily. As more and more DP-awareness gets out among the developers, the dual procs will become more and more important.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 16th, 2001, 04:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
djubelirer is on a distinguished road
resale

I never thought about that...so will the resale value on the Dual 800 be much better than the 867, or will it hold its value much better comparitively. I would think so simply because Mac only makes a few DP computers. The 867 seems fast now, but next year when we have 1.2ghz machines it will seem slow, while the DP 800 will continue to be speedy and hold its value....is this true?

Any opinions welcome....thanks for the advice. Big decision here

David
__________________
G4 Tower Dual 800mhz Quicksilver, 80GB, SuperDrive, 1.1GB RAM, 17" Studio Display, OS X 10.1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 16th, 2001, 04:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: University of Betelgeuse V
Posts: 268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
wyvern is on a distinguished road
Well, yes, kind of Remember there may be dual processor 1.2ghz g4's though and nothing now can compare to that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 16th, 2001, 11:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 141
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
buggs1a is on a distinguished road
dual cpu will always out last single cpu no matter what. resale value is always a lot higher too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
emac vs. 733 Quicksilver and 867 Dual pbmac Hardware & Peripherals 2 August 19th, 2002 03:39 PM
G4 (Dual 800 or 867) Which One? djubelirer Hardware & Peripherals 9 October 16th, 2001 03:33 PM
G4 (Dual 800 or 867) Which one? djubelirer Hardware & Peripherals 0 October 15th, 2001 10:29 AM
10.1 release slower then 5g27 on my dual buggs1a Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 9 September 30th, 2001 09:27 AM
10.1 : Upgrade from Apple or Retailers? Laurent LaSalle Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 0 September 29th, 2001 09:23 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.