|
#17
July 5th, 2007, 07:01 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Neat house, neat kids. The iPhone definitely fills the role a camera phone should: to share candid snapshots of wherever you might be or whatever you might be doing. A phone is not intended to be a Nikon D80!
__________________ • 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon • 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro • 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo • 8GB iPhone  |
|
#19
July 6th, 2007, 07:54 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| I don't know, it looks fine to me. I carry a 8MP Canon SLR everywhere I go anyway, for me a camera on a phone would only be for those pub/bar pics that everyone saturates social networking sites with ("here's me with a generic drunk blonde, here's me with a really wacky guy I met, look how socially active and funky I am" etc) so its not really about quality, more about spontaneity and convenience. If the quality is that much of an issue for someone they really should buy a camera, or at least one of those camera phones where the camera is half the point, like the Sony Cybershot phone range. What really worries me is the iPhone will be coming out in Europe probably not that long before the 1st revision is out in the States, lumping me with the old one for a two-year contract. Like being seen in public with a chunky black and white screened iPod, the shame!
__________________ Mac Pro Dual 2.66Ghz 2Gb/250Gb / MacBook Dual 1.42 1Gb/80GB / AGP Graphics G4 500Mhz 1Gb/40Gb / WD-MyBook / |
