image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac Classic System & Software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #9  
Old January 16th, 2007, 04:23 AM
andychrist's Avatar
devil's plaything
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: E.Vil.
Posts: 832
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
andychrist is on a distinguished road
By unchecking all the extra languages and such, leaving only Basic System and BSD Subsystem when you install OS X, you can get away with a boot volume that uses up only about 3 GB. So you will have another 3 GB remaining of free space, but as Eric pointed out, you will need some of that for virtual memory. Also OS X keeps adding to various caches, which can use up a goodly amount of MB. So you're not going to have a lot of room left over for iTunes, maybe a gig or so. Still, better than nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old January 16th, 2007, 10:04 AM
Ferdinand's Avatar
V. Tech
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Ferdinand is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by andychrist View Post
By unchecking all the extra languages and such, leaving only Basic System and BSD Subsystem when you install OS X, you can get away with a boot volume that uses up only about 3 GB. So you will have another 3 GB remaining of free space, but as Eric pointed out, you will need some of that for virtual memory. Also OS X keeps adding to various caches, which can use up a goodly amount of MB. So you're not going to have a lot of room left over for iTunes, maybe a gig or so. Still, better than nothing.
Thanks for the info. Now I'm just checking what my local Apple store has in terms of RAM etc...
__________________
MacBook / 2 GHz / 1.5 GB RAM / 100 GB HD / Mac OS X 10.6.1
iMac G4 / 700 MHz / 768 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple TV / 160 GB
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old January 16th, 2007, 10:25 AM
bobw's Avatar
The Late: SuperMacMod
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Phila,PA
Posts: 8,835
Thanks: 0
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
bobw has a spectacular aura aboutbobw has a spectacular aura about
Look HERE for memory.

Also check http://www.ramseeker.com for prices.

Apple's prices will probably be higher.
__________________


Last edited by bobw; January 16th, 2007 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old January 16th, 2007, 12:08 PM
andychrist's Avatar
devil's plaything
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: E.Vil.
Posts: 832
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
andychrist is on a distinguished road
Exclamation

Uhm, actually this is what you would want for your iMac, though I don't know if OWC ships to where you live. The important thing to know is that your machine has two slots for RAM, one on each side of the CPU card. One of them, I think the bottom slot, can only take the shorter, "low profile" chip, though I guess the short chip could fit into either slot. So if you could pick up a couple of those 256 MB jobies you'd be able to max out that iMac.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old January 17th, 2007, 11:44 AM
Ferdinand's Avatar
V. Tech
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Ferdinand is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the info - I'll compare whats cheaper:
US RAM plus shipping or RAM from the Apple Store... but shipping alone is more than double than what the RAM costs at OWC, so we'll see, but thanks anyway!
__________________
MacBook / 2 GHz / 1.5 GB RAM / 100 GB HD / Mac OS X 10.6.1
iMac G4 / 700 MHz / 768 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple TV / 160 GB
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old January 17th, 2007, 03:18 PM
sinclair_tm's Avatar
wow, 1.4g is way faster!
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dusty Mexican Border Lands
Posts: 1,005
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
sinclair_tm is on a distinguished road
turth be told, it can be done, but it will not be fun to fun os x on that imac. i had a buddy that at one time was the it guy for a company that had a bunch of imacs, and when the boss decided to have os x on all of them, my buddies nightmares began. with the ram maxed out, and the limitation on the hard drive size, os x 10.2 ran so slow that it was unuable most of the time, and there wasn't the room needed for the apps they needed to run. i personally would never run os x on anything slower than 350mhz, as then thats almost to slow for work. but if you want to do it, have fun.
__________________
Digital Audio G4/1.467ghz, 1.5gig ram, 16x Superdrive, 256mb DDR3 AGP 6800GS, zip, 2x500gig raid0 for 1tb on sonnet tempo trio, 10.5.4
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old February 12th, 2007, 12:21 PM
Ferdinand's Avatar
V. Tech
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Ferdinand is on a distinguished road
Follow up: I have 320 MB of RAM now, still on OS 9, but Internet & everything hooked up. I just clean installed OS X on some Macs and all apps (iLife etc...) is 7 GB, so no way of OS X on that iMac.
__________________
MacBook / 2 GHz / 1.5 GB RAM / 100 GB HD / Mac OS X 10.6.1
iMac G4 / 700 MHz / 768 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple TV / 160 GB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.