|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| diablo2 1.1? anybody have an underground release date?
__________________ setup: dual 500 G4, 768 ram, 30 and 80 gigHD, dvd cdrw, radeon 9000 w/ 19 inch KDS, 17 inch Apple Studio Display Powerbook g3 "Prismo", 400 mhz, 128 ram 6 gigHD, dvd AIM-ihatestuf |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| very soon (some time this week says my source) (assuming you mean the patch) |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Oooh! Is this patch going to finally make it run in OS X and have support for my GeForce 4? I hate running this game using software acceleration ![]() |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| sorry, i'm new around here... but whats wrong with it under osx? it runs fairly well for me (definitely good enough to play) in 800x600 on my 667 powerbook. is it only nvidia cards? in other news, i'm dying for 1.10 |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| With NVidia cards, Diablo II runs like crap, even on a dual 800. And the 1.10 patch has been coming out "next week" for about a year now. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| So its only with Nvidia card? Heh...no wonder its so slow for me...
__________________ http://www.realultimatepower.net/...Are you ready to get pumped!!? Last edited by Stridder44; March 7th, 2003 at 11:23 PM. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Actually, for both NVIDIA and ATI cards, hardware acceleration isn't as consistent as software mode in terms of performance for both OS 9 and OS X. Hardware rendering may seem high at first, but once a lot of stuff starts happening on screen then performance drops through the floor. The absolutely best way to play Diablo II is with a 3dfx card (Voodoo3 or greater) using Glide acceleration. The 3d accelerated aspect of the game was designed with Glide in mind because at the time 3dfx was the king of 3d game acceleration. In OS 9, RAVE is alright, but heavy traffic can cause major issues. With OpenGL, performance is even worse. In OS X, OpenGL is the only hardware accelerated API to choose from, but there are issues with texture loading and unloading which cause major performance hits (according to more than one Mac developer). With FPS games, most textues load during level loading before any action starts. With a game like Diablo II, which is basically a 2D game with a bunch of textures, textures are constantly being loaded and unloaded from the 3D card's VRAM. Because the maps are so big in Diablo II, it's not feasible to load all the textures for the game within the VRAM, let alone the system RAM. Since OS X's OpenGL has slow texture loading and unloading, Diablo II performance suffers. So basically, unless you're running in OS 9 with a 3dfx card, I think it's better for people to use software rendering. Even with my dual 1.33 GHz Mac with a Radeon 8500, I use software mode in both OS 9 and OS X because of the very noticeable performance issues and even major graphical glitches which occur with RAVE and OpenGL rendering. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Ah. Well, I hope the next OpenGL version will fix that problem up....is Apple in charge of OpenGL updates or is some other company?
__________________ http://www.realultimatepower.net/...Are you ready to get pumped!!? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mail 1.1 Change SMTP port (question) | evlampiy | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 4 | October 6th, 2005 02:28 PM |
| Bad Safari 1.1 | Philip83 | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 4 | October 28th, 2003 08:01 AM |
| Entourage to Palm Sync Office 10.1.5 & Sync 1.1 | dixonbm | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 4 | September 8th, 2003 06:05 PM |
| iSync 1.1 breaks Palm conduit | rharder | Hardware & Peripherals | 4 | August 7th, 2003 10:07 PM |
| iPhoto 1.1 | simX | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 1 | May 1st, 2002 10:22 AM |